Page 97 - Sociology and You

non-intrusive
interventionists
Chapter 2 Sociologists Doing Research
67
Ethical issues. When we first began the study, we openly informed all of the students that we were from Indiana University and were doing a study of middle school students. We as- sured students of our concern with protecting their privacy by not using their actual names or revealing private information to others who might know them. The only concern expressed by a few students was that they not get in trou- ble for swearing. Since we were not aware of a no-swearing rule and had not been asked to en- force it, they soon lost this concern. Several stu- dents again expressed a similar concern when they were first tape-recorded, asking us who would be allowed to hear the tapes. We assured them that the tapes would not be seen or heard by anyone who could identify them and that we would not use their names in papers or books about the study.
We were prepared in advance for these par- ticular ethical issues and had ready responses that relieved people’s concerns. Other ethical dilemmas arose during the course of the study for which we did not have clear solutions. [Two of the researchers] . . . witnessed several inci- dents of verbal harassment, and Steve witnessed one incident that included physical harassment. Since we had tried from the start to minimize our roles as authority figures in the school, neither of them intervened as adults to stop these incidents. Instead they relied on strategies
Read and React
What Does it Mean
extracurricular
after school; beyond the normal school courses
interventionist
someone who gets involved to make a change
non-intrusive
not obviously noticeable; non-threatening
transcribed
made a written copy; put into written form
directly, we would have
figures, and it is likely that students would no longer have acted as naturally in our presence, thus limiting the extent to which we could gain information about peer interactions. On the other hand, it was deeply disturbing to the researchers to witness these events without intervening. We struggled with the question of whether noninter- vention might convey an implicit message that such behavior is acceptable to adults.
Source: Donna Eder, School Talk, New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1995, pp. 172–175.
such as not participating themselves, or drawing the attention of others away from the target of ridicule to some other activity.
These incidents raise challenging questions about the role of re- searchers as observers of naturally occurring behavior, as opposed to
who try to change the behav- ior of others, especially if it appears to be cruel or abusive. Had we de- cided to intervene more
been seen as authority
1. In the first paragraph, the author writes that the observers did not openly take notes. Wouldn’t it make more sense to take notes while the events were happening? Why would the observers wait to record their observations?
2. What do you think the author means by the term field notes in the third paragraph?
3. What steps did the research team take to ensure that the students’ privacy rights were not
abused?
4. What ethical problems did the researchers face in the course of their observations? Would you have taken the same steps as the researchers? What other action could have been taken?