Page 35 - S44 Compendium

GRAPH 1
Jefferson Parish Public School System System 44 Students, Grades 6–9 (N=124) Performance on SRI by Student Group, 2009–2010
400 350 300 250 200 150 100
50 0
All Students
(N=124)
LEP Students
(n=15)
Students With Disabilities
(n=47)
Fall 2009 Spring 2010
348L
308L
236L
181L
184L
139L
Gain: 167L
Gain: 97L
Gain: 124L
Southern United States
Note. The gains in Lexile were signi cant overall (t=9.83, p=.00), for students who were limited-English pro cient (t=2.64, p=.02), and for students with disabilities (t=3.92, p=.00).
GRAPH 2
Jefferson Parish Public School System System 44 Students, Grades 6–9 (N=124) Performance Levels on LEAP/iLEAP, 2009–2010
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
0
TABLE 1
Unsatisfactory
Approaching Basic
Basic
68%
Spring 2009 Spring 2010
60%
30%
31%
2%
9%
Jefferson Parish Public School System System 44 Students, Grades 6–9 (N=124) Performance Levels on LEAP/iLEAP, 2009–2010
Note. Of the 74 students who performed in the Unsatisfactory Performance Level on the Leap/iLeap, 67% remained in this level, 30% moved to the Approaching Basic Level, and 4% moved to the Basic Level.
2009 Leap/iLeap Performance Levels
2010 Leap/iLeap Performance Levels
2009 Total Count
Unsatisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Approaching Basic
Basic
67%
30%
4%
84
Approaching Basic
46%
35%
19%
37
Basic
33%
33%
33%
3
2010 Total Count
74
39
11
124
33
% of Students SRI Lexile Score