Page 58 - S44 Compendium

56
REFERENCES
Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Committee on the Prevention of Reading Dif culties in Young Children., Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Grif n, P. (1998). Preventing reading dif culties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Kim, J. S., Capotosto, L. C., Hartry, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2011). Can a mixed-method literacy intervention improve the reading achievement of low-performing elementary school students in an after-school program? Results from a randomized controlled trial of READ 180 Enterprise. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 183–201.
Lang, L., Torgesen, J., Vogel, W., Chanter, C., Lefsky, E., & Petscher, Y. (2009). Exploring the relative effectiveness of reading interventions for high school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(2), 149–175.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scienti c research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00–4769). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Salinger, T., Toplitz, M., Jones, W., Moorthy, S., and Rosenthal, E. (2010). Implementation matters: Systems for success. A descriptive study of READ 180 in urban middle schools. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2010). Northeastern Florida School District Research Update. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2011). Ann Arbor Public Schools Research Update. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2011). Central Indiana School District Research Update. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2011). Lawrence Public Schools Research Update. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2011). Midland Independent School District Research Update. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2011). Three Public School Districts: English Language Learners Research Update. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2011). Three Public School Districts: Students With Learning Disabilities Research Update. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2012). Murrieta Valley Uni ed School District Research Update. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2013). Saginaw Public Schools Research Update. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2014). Napa Valley Uni ed School District Research Update. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Slavin, R.E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best- evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 290–322.
Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading dif culties. Journal of School Psychology, 40(1), 7–26.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Ef ciency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Publishing, Inc.
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.