Page 55 - System 44 EL in Research Paper

REFERENCES (cont.)
Peterson, C. L., Caverly, D. C., Nicholson, S. A., O’Neal, S., & Cusenbary, S. (2000). Building reading proficiency at the secondary level: A guide to resources. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Retrieved from http:// www.sedl.org/pubs/reading16/buildingreading.pdf
Place, N. A. (2002). Policy in action: The influence of mandated early reading assessment on teachers’ thinking and practice. In D. L. Schallert, C.M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, B. Malock, & J. V. Hoffman (Eds.), Fiftieth yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 45–58). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
Prasse, D. P. (2009). Why adopt an RTI model. Retrieved from the RTI Action Network at http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/what/ whyrti
Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (Vol. 3, pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pressley, M., Gaskins, I., Solic, K., & Collins, S. (2006). A portrait of benchmark school: How a school produces high achievement in students who previously failed. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 282–306.
Proctor, C. P., Dalton, B., & Grisham, D. L. (2007). Scaffolding English Language Learners and struggling readers in a universal literacy environment with embedded strategy instruction and vocabulary support. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(1), 71–93.
Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword-reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28–53.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Raphael, T. E., George, M., Weber, C. M., & Nies, A. (2008). Approaches to teaching reading comprehension. In Israel, S. E., and Duffy, G. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 449–469). London: Routledge.
Readence, J. E., Bean, T. W., & Baldwin, R. S. (2004). Content area literacy: An integrated approach (8th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Reed, D. K. (2008). A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in grades K–12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(1), 36–49.
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Education Technology, 15(1), 67–70.
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Rose, D. H., Meyer, A., Strangman, N., & Rappolt, G. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for
learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Ruwe, K., McLaughlin, T. F., Derby, K. M., & Johnson, J. (2011). The multiple effects of direct instruction flashcards on sight word acquisition, passage reading, and errors for three middle school students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 23(3), 241–255.
Sabornie, E. J. (1994). Social-affective characteristics in early adolescents identified as learning disabled and nondisabled. Learning Disability Quarterly, 77, 268–279.
Sagor, R. (2003). Motivating students and teachers in an error of standards. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Saunders, K. (1998). Modern languages in crisis? Language Learning Journal, 18, 63–67.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Steinbach, R. (1984). Teach ability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive
Science, 8(2), 173–190.
Schatschneider, C., Buck, J., Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Hassler, L., Hecht, S., & Powell-Smith, K. (2004).
A multivariate study of factors that contribute to individual differences in performance on the Florida Comprehensive
53