Page 6 - SEC Comment BDW Forms

“tangible chattel paper” within the meaning of the applicable UCC, such original contract was delivered to the Servicer and, in accordance with the Customary Servicing Practices of the Servicer, was or will be destroyed as soon as practicable after the expiration of 14 days after the conversion of such original contract to an electronic record by a scanning and imaging process. After destruction of the original contract, the related Receivable will be evidenced only by “electronic chattel paper” within the meaning of the applicable UCC. Excerpt from S.E.C. 10k report by Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/ 1131131/000092963816001450/a70110_exhibit4-4.htm The FTZ’s are used as trafficking vehicles to repackage, alter, and deface trademarked, CBP registered goods, that are concealed, counterfeited and trafficked through Broker-Dealer and attorney gatekeeping networks for illegal insider trading in “Street Name” on the public exchanges. The original issuer ESC who has been placed into debt bondage by slander of title, concealment and as the original issuer has been unlawfully converted to a debtor. Pooling and servicing agreements are allowed to be created from the same side by side collateral that the Counties in States in insurrection and rebellion have allowed to be placed on the public record contrary to law. the steal from the indigenous fiscal resources, a colorable practice that ought to be immediately eliminated, starting with modifying the BDW Form prior to allowing Broker-Dealers out of compliance, and free from past criminal acts. Involuntary Bankruptcy proceedings ought to be enacted against corporate charters and against the license of every Broker-Dealer withdrawing who has operated in conflict with law by interference in restraint of trade, deprivation against the intangible right to honest services. The Securities and Exchange Commission is regulating a systematic monopolization of trade by oversight, and granting clemency without regard to the criminal behavior of regulated persons, acts to ignore intentional misrepresentations in the off-balance sheet accounting and false statement that conflict with public records, creating a regulated platform for the “money changers” that illegally securitize restricted, controlled private securities, the unscrupulous use of safe harbor exemptions by companies that claim to have purchased restricted secured securities from the original depositary, financial institution to then turn around and bill the same original issuer. Congress established protective acts such as 1862 Legal Tender Act, 1933 Securities, 1934 Exchange, 1935 Public Utility Holding, 1939 Trust Indenture, and 1940 Investment Company Acts, charging Securities and Exchange Commission S.E.C., with regulatory authority with duty to act according to law. Form BDW is an example of the oversight and lack of enforcement to protect ESC’s identified by Congressional Acts, despite being affected with a national public interest in that, among other things the securities issued by ESC’s, constitute a substantial part of all securities publicly offered. SEC File No. 270-17, OMB Control No. 3235-0018