Page 7 - 14_PBC to Begg_27-4-16 (9pp)

-7-
d) we still await a comment on that situation.
e) your thirteen page 23 March 2016 letter was an extraordinary compilation of accusations as opposed to what one would have thought to be a very simple [and incurring no costs or expenses whatsoever from MHML for supplying, as opposed to very substantial time costs for sourcing and itemising our required denials to allegations made in your letter] and to the point request, namely we would propose:
Dear Sirs,
I represent lessee, Mrs M. Hillgarth of Flat 5 Mitre House SW3 who wishes, as is her right, to view the various original invoices (not copies) pertaining to the £105,877 Reserves Utilised in your published year end accounts for 2014 dated 30 May 2015.
Please arrange for these to be made available within 30 days.
f) had your request been along those lines we would, as we did, fully comply, despite the request being somewhat way past any statutory time limits for doing so but the request would still be considered valid.
Schedule 8_pp17 (5)_The Lessor shall procure that there shall be open to inspection by the Lessee
during normal working hours during the daytime on reasonable notice in writing at the Lessor’s premises
for a period of six months following the date of the Accountant’s certificate the audited accounts for the preceding Maintenance Year and the Lessor shall further supply to the Lessee a summary of such accounts [we are though quite content to supply photostat copies on any rendezvous despite no obligation]
g) but your request was not along those lines but a rambling thirteen page cacophony of accusations, innuendos and slurs, all of which we have not only denied but proved to be untrue. True or false?
h) as such we were more than entitled to insist on confirmations [or denials with supporting evidence] that your client Mrs Hillgarth had indeed made untrue statements to you which you have then, on her behalf [and we note, not employing the WP privilege] communicated to ourselves in correspondence.
i) not only have we insisted on the confirmations as described above, but we also insisted that Mrs Hillgarth comply with the terms of her lease covenants, [and she has remained so despite requests to comply from previous agents, evidence of which we also supplied you] which for the avoidance of any doubt are :
Schedule 6_pp12 (15.1.2)_Not at anytime to grant an underlease of the premises as a whole without the previous consent in writing of the Lessor.
ͅ Schedule 6_pp13 (23)_The Lessee shall not keep any animal on the premises to which the
Lessor shall reasonably object in writing and upon receiving notice in writing from the Lessor
requiring him either to remove such animal or to take such steps with regard to the control thereof as the said notice shall stipulate the Lessee shall comply with the same within seven days of the date thereof. [previous tenant Ms Cheever kept cats of which you were fully aware - and like all your previous tenants has left a string of debts ref; the various visits of debt collectors we have entertained...]
ͅ Schedule 6_pp13 (24)_The Lessee shall not reside or use or permit any other person to reside in or use the Premises unless the floors thereof (including the passages) are close covered
with carpet and underfelt or (in the bathroom lavatory and kitchen only) linoleum or
sound absorbing tiles except whilst the same shall be removed for cleaning repairing or decorating the Premises or for some temporary purpose.
ͅ Schedule 6_pp15 (30)_The Lessee shall pay to the Lessor on demand all costs charges and expenses (including legal costs and surveyor’s fee) which may be incurred by the
Lessor in respect of the preparation and service of a Schedule of Dilapidations or under or in contemplation of any proceedings in respect of the Premises under Section 146 and 147 of the Law of Property Act 1925 or in the preparation or service of any notice thereunder
respectively notwithstanding that forfeiture is avoided otherwise than by relief granted by the Court.
ͅ Schedule 6_pp15 (36)_The Lessee shall at all times comply with the terms of the Head Lease so far as they relate to the Premises and to keep indemnified the Lessor against any breach thereof by the Lessee.
j) as regards any misunderstanding or further innuendo as to our compliance [or non compliance] on previous occasions, I would remind Mrs Hillgarth of just two examples of her requests and our replies:
Namely, on 17 March 2015 Mrs Hillgarth made a request via email: [note the date 17 March 2015]
“Please supply the invoices from the contractors for the following as they have been requested by my accountant”: [that statement re accountant is without doubt an untruth]