Page 60 - teachers.PDF

Barton, P. E. Too much testing of the wrong kind; too little of the right kind in K-12 education. A policy information perspective. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. ED 430 052.
Davey, L. (1992). The case for a national test. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 3 (1). [Available online: http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=3&n=1]
Davey, L. and Neill, M. (1992). The case against a national test. ERIC Digest. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation. American Institutes of Research. ED 338 703.
General Accounting Office (1998). Student testing: Issues related to voluntary national mathematics and reading tests. Report to the Honorable William F. Goodling, Chairman, Committee on Education and the Workforce, House of Representatives, and the Honorable John Ashcroft, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: Author. ED 423 244.
Hoff, D. J. (1998). Strong words underscore national testing question. Education Week, February 18, 1998.
Houston Chronicle Interactive. (1997). Debate on education focuses on national testing program. September 9, 1997.
Los Angeles Times (1997). Lott assails Clinton’s plan for school tests. November 2, 1997. National Center for Education Statistics (November 1999). The NAEP guide: A
description of the content and methods of the 1999 and 2000 assessments. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. [Available online at http://www.nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/guide/2000456.shtml].
Rudner, L. and W. Schafer (2002) What Teachers Need to Know About Assessment. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
From the free on-line version. To order print copies call 800 229-4200
55