Page 57 - 2018_Jour_85-1_Societal-Issues

Schools and Societal Issues 57

Ajzen, I. (2012). Martin Fishbein’s legacy: The reasoned action approach. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social
Science, 640(1), 11–27.
Aronson, L., Niehaus, B., Lindow, J., Robertson, P. A., & O’Sullivan, P. S. (2011). Development and pilot testing of a reflective
learning guide for medical education. Medical Teacher, 33(10), e515–e521. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.599894

Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research,
65(3), 245–281.
Cleveland, J. N., Lim, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2007). Feedback phobia? Why employees do not want to give or receive performance
feedback. In J. Fox-Langan, C. L. Cooper, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds), Research companion to dysfunctional workplace:
Management challenges and symptoms (pp. 168–186). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Danielson, C. (2009). A framework for learning to teach. Educational Leadership, 66. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org
/publications/educational-leadership/summer09/vol66/num09/A-Framework-for-Learning-to-Teach.aspx
Danielson, C. (2011). Evaluations that help teachers learn. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 35–39.
Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument, 2013 instructionally focused edition. Princeton, NJ: The
Danielson Group.
Danielson, C. (2014). Connecting Common Core to teacher evaluation. School Administrator, 71(3), 30–33.
Despain, J., & Juarez-Torres, R. (2012). Teachers’ and administrators’ perceptions of observation and evaluation affecting teacher
performance. The John Ben Shepperd Journal of Practical Leadership, (6)1, 87–120.
Elliott, J. (2001). Making evidence-based practice educational. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 555–574.
Feeney, E. J. (2007). Quality feedback: The essential ingredient for teacher success. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies,
Issues and Ideas, 80(4), 191–198.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2005). Theory-based behavior change interventions: Comments on Hobbis and Sutton. Journal of Health
Psychology, 10, 27–31.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York City, NY: Psychology Press.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York City, NY: Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2001). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Johnson, S. M. (2011). Teachers must have an effective evaluation system. American Federation of Teachers, 1–3. Retrieved from
http://danielsongroup.org/ckeditor/ckfinder/userfiles/files/WhyTeachersMustHaveanEff ctiveEvaluationSystem.pdf

Kettenbach, G. (1995). Writing SOAP notes. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
Mahar, J., & Strobert, B. (2010). The use of 360-degree feedback compared to traditional evaluative feedback for the professional
growth of teachers in k-12 education. Planning and Changing, 41(3-4), 147–160. NEEDS ADJUSTMENT
Marshall, K. (2009). Rethinking teacher supervision and evaluation: How to work smart, build collaboration, and close the achievement gap.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Marzano, R. J., Frontier, T., & Livingston, D. (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA:
ASCD.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Myung, J., & Martinez, K. (2013). Strategies for enhancing the impact of post-observation feedback for teachers. Stanford, CA: Carnegie
Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
New Teacher, P. (2010). Teacher Evaluation 2.0. New Teacher Project.
Ovando, M. N., & Harris, B. M. (1993). Teachers’ perceptions of the post-observation conference: Implications for formative
evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(4), 301–310.

Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2000). Alternative approaches to supervision: Cases from the field. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,
15(3), 212–235.
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York City, NY: Falmer.