Page 823 - Appeal bundle 31 files
P. 823

Appeal Bundle




               Planning Application comments have been made. A summary of the comments is
               provided below.


               Comments were submitted at 4:37 PM on 04 Aug 2019 from Mr John Scaife.


                Application Summary
                               Wealden House Lewes Road Ashurst Wood West Sussex
                Address:
                               RH19 3TB
                               Proposed new build residential development consisting of
                               54 units following the demolition of all existing site
                               buildings. (Additional Information - Statement of
                Proposal:
                               Community Involvement received 04/04/2019).
                               Amended plans and revised supporting information
                               received 31 July.
                Case Officer: Steven King

                Click for further information


                Customer Details
                Name:          Mr John Scaife
                Address:       Turramurra Lewes Road Ashurst Wood


                Comments Details
                Commenter
                Type:           Neighbour or general public
                Stance:         Customer objects to the Planning Application
                Reasons for
                comment:
                Comments:       We sent you our objection and reasons 2 April 2019, and
                                they still apply.

                                We note that you have since added a lot of other
                                documents to the MSDC website details about this
                                planning application.

                                One of these was from the LHA (Local Highways
                                Authority) and you indicate it was received on 22/05/19.

                                The section headed 'Trip Generation and Capacity'
                                claims, to our utter astonishment, that there will be a
                                decrease in two-way vehicular traffic figures for the site.
                                It states that this is "based upon sites considered to be
                                comparable in terms of planning use class and location
                                to that proposed" and "provides a realistic indication of
                                likely trip generation from the new dwellings
                                in comparison with the existing use."

                                We wonder what sites were considered and by whom? To
                                us the results seem contrary to all common sense.


                                Thus, we continue to object on the grounds of reduced





                                                     BATES N0   000820
   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828