Page 251 - Bundle for MF Final
P. 251

Bates no   250














                     1. LETTER LOUISE TO MR ABEY



                     Dear Mr Abey,

                    As you know, I am currently represented by HFC Law and have to provide you with a list of
                    documents I require Mr Solhiem to disclose by 16.00 on Tuesday 14 April 2020. I refer to
                                                                             th
                    your Form N265 dated 26 March 2020 which is incomplete and not in the spirit of a fair,
                                           th
                    full and frank disclosure. To use the vernacular, it "is taking the piss".
                     I do not accept that the documentation relating to your client's insurance claims are
                     privileged.  In fact, most of the documents I wish to review are between him and his insurers
                    or easyJet and are dated before any legal action was commenced.

                     Because of the Wuhan virus lock down and the Easter Bank Holiday, I have been unable to
                    contact HFC and I therefore attach a preliminary, specific list of documents I require Mr
                    Solhiem to provide for my inspection.  I am not sure whether I can continue to afford legal
                    fees and for the time being, at least, please direct all communications to me.

                    The documents I need to inspect are fundamental to this case for three main reasons:

                        1. They are central to Mr Solheim's credibility and his current but untruthful  assertions
                           that the £500,000 was an  "agreed in writ", under a  "joint undersnding",
                           TOLATA "contribution which was  "secud on Nutley Place";

                        2. It supports my contention that the £500,000 was in every legal and other sense a
                           "gift" involving an unconditional transfer of title to me

                        3. It is critical that the Court confirms the provenance of the Claimant's funds and
                           ensures that any redistribution of assets is not liable to proceeds of crime or
                           "fundamental dishonesty" reversal;

                    A provisional annotated list is attached.

                    Your sincerely,




                    Louise Siggers
   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256