Page 96 - MJC submissions

The AWNP and Available Land

Capacity RATIOS
Comments & Referendum Results
SHEI.AA
IN VIUAGE PIAN (March 2016) Ref Area {ha) Density
Dwelling, Residents Derived Dwellings
Estimated per ha Referendum
Comments
For Against In VIiiage
4 land between 98-104 Maypole lane (Site 6) s 10 0.16 31.25 This area 51 46
6 Mount Pleasant Nursery, Canslron lane (site 7) 3 6 1.28 2.34 74 24
11 WIiiow Trees (Site Sa) 2 0.30 6.67 136:25 (Net ttl) In favour- no Impact on village centre 136 25
16
12 Spinney HIii (Site Sb) 2 0.50 4.00 135:25 (Net 110) In favour 135 25
Brownfield SHI.AAID470 SHI.AAID470 134:31 (Net 103) In favour.
13 Wealden House EDF (Site 9) EDF so 130 470 0.84 59.52 The estimate of 50 lnduded an allocation for affordable homes. It 131 31
was not the most favoured site as claimed by the developer
The Sustainability Report (September 2015) only reviewed the car
park (0.08ha) although the entire WH-LIC site was lnduded In the
Wealden House. UC (Actually NCP) (Site 10 shows entire site) but 757
14 sustainability shows only the Northern car park was reviewed In the 7 later Merged 0.08 Neighbourhood Plan a month later 139 26
A pre-application was made by Weald Property Investments Umited
Sustainability Report with 470 to develop the WH-LCP but this was not pursued- too near to the
A22777
Total In Neighbourhood Plan 62 162 3.16 19.62

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF Wealden House sites
EDF (as orooosed) 71 200 0.84 84.52 50 olus 21 affordable homes
Ufe Improvement Centre and NCP so 100 0.54 92.59
Combined 121 300 1.28 94.53
Ashbourne Park 14 0.5 28.00 Estimated {land Registry data not available)

E:\Cobasco\Persol, House and computer instrucs\E0F and WH Oevelopment\MJC Plans theories and 0bjectlves\Spreadsheets\WH Sites analysisMJC Cals