Page 40 - Election Book-ENG
P. 40

(KAIST- South Korea’s MIT) noted a strange feature after
            examining the voting results. The last-to-be-counted early
            voting results turned out to be just enough to tip the balance
            for Democratic Party candidates in district after district –
            and by about the same amount. The only explanation for the
            coincidence, the former head of KAIST said, was: “Either God
            did it or it was rigged.”

            Regular citizens, even in the face of government pressure,
            produced additional evidence. They cited problems with
            electronic counting machines; counterfeit ballots; ‘throughput’
            speeds at voting sites that amounted to a matter of seconds per
            voter; and ballot ‘chain of custody’ issues, among others.

            !e evidence is detailed, public, and open to challenge. And it is
            still available.


            It was memorialized for posterity by a private organization, One
            Korea Network(OKN), and has been published as a White Paper
            on Electoral Fraud 2020.


            Moon Jae-In’s response? To call it fake news and conspiracy
            theories, while putting pressure on the people who raised the
            charges. The National Election Commission’s response was
            muddled and unconvincing, and it apparently destroyed at least
            some of the evidence.


            The NEC steadfastly resisted attempts at recounts and
            punished anyone who challenged it, which resulted in numerous
            investigations against those who raised election fraud concerns.





        40  Election Fraud in South Korea: Documenting the Truth
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45