Page 40 - Election Book-ENG

(KAIST- South Korea’s MIT) noted a strange feature after
examining the voting results. The last-to-be-counted early
voting results turned out to be just enough to tip the balance
for Democratic Party candidates in district after district –
and by about the same amount. The only explanation for the
coincidence, the former head of KAIST said, was: “Either God
did it or it was rigged.”

Regular citizens, even in the face of government pressure,
produced additional evidence. They cited problems with
electronic counting machines; counterfeit ballots; ‘throughput’
speeds at voting sites that amounted to a matter of seconds per
voter; and ballot ‘chain of custody’ issues, among others.

!e evidence is detailed, public, and open to challenge. And it is
still available.

It was memorialized for posterity by a private organization, One
Korea Network(OKN), and has been published as a White Paper
on Electoral Fraud 2020.

Moon Jae-In’s response? To call it fake news and conspiracy
theories, while putting pressure on the people who raised the
charges. The National Election Commission’s response was
muddled and unconvincing, and it apparently destroyed at least
some of the evidence.

The NEC steadfastly resisted attempts at recounts and
punished anyone who challenged it, which resulted in numerous
investigations against those who raised election fraud concerns.

40 Election Fraud in South Korea: Documenting the Truth