Page 2 - The People of the State of New York v. M. Robert Neulander - Brief for Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant-Respondent
P. 2

I.
                                                                        II.
                                                   A.
                                                                                C.
                                             B.
                                                                                                 A.
                                                                                         B.



                                                        TESTIMONY

                                                                                              Impartial Juror

                                             The Presumption of
                                                                                      .
                                                                                The People's Recitation of
                                                                  MISCONDUCT HERE CREA
                                                                                                       TRIAL IS REQUIRED AS A MA




                                                                                         A New Trial Is Required as a Matter of




                                                                                Alleged Evidence of
                                                                                                                                             TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                 A Juror's Honesty is the Most Relevant Barometer. of
                                                                             .
                                                              IMPARTIALITY, AND THE PEOPLE CANNOT REBUT
                                                                                                          THEN LIES UNDER OATH ABOUT HAVING DONE SO -


                                                                     PREJUDICE IS COGNIZABLE, THE JUROR'S CUMULATIVE
                                                                        EVEN IF THE PEOPLE'S ARGlJMENT THAT THERE WAS NO
                                                   Cumulative Misconduct by a Juror Gives Rise to a Presumption of
                                                                                                                    A DEFENDANT IS DEPRIVED OF THE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY AN
                                                                  TES A PRESUMPTION OF LACK OF
                                                                                                                IMPARTIAL JURY WHEN A JUROR ENGAGES IN CUMULATIVE
                                             Juror Bias That Arises From a Juror's Dishonesty
                                                           THIS PRESUMPTION THROUGH THAT JUROR'S OWN TAINTED
                                                                                Guilt is Irrelevant to the
                                                                                                          AND A NEW
                                                                                                             MISCONDUCT THAT VIOLATES THE COURT'S INSTRUCTIONS, AND
                                                                                                 Whether She Was an
                                                                                         Law When a Juror is as Thoroughly
                                                                                      Mendacious as Juror 12 ................................................................................ 11
                                                        .................................................................................................... 18
                                                   Bias  .... 18
                                                                                                                              SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................................................................ 2
                                                                                                                         ARGlJMENT ............................................................................................................ 5
                               CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ...................................................................... 29
                                                                                              ................................................................................................. 6
                                                                             Question Whether the Juror Was Unfit to Have Served .............................. 16
                                          Cannot be Rebutted by the Juror's Own Tainted Testimony ....................... 20
                                                                                                       TIER OF LAW ............................................. 5
                                     CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 28
                                                                                                                                    INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ......................................................................... 1
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7