Page 3 - Penalties:To Amend or Not to Amend: Correcting Non-Compliance on Past Returns
P. 3

can be extremely important for a taxpayer to correct a   proceeds with a voluntary disclosure. The IRS will run the
           fraudulent return because the consequences of a fraudulent   taxpayer’s name against lists of taxpayers that the IRS or
           return can be so severe. The civil fraud penalty is 75% of   the Department of Justice has already identified for audit
           the underpayment on the return  and, more significantly,   or investigation, and will respond to the taxpayer inform-
                                      11
           a taxpayer who filed a fraudulent return risks criminal   ing him or her that he or she is either pre-cleared to make
           prosecution.                                         a disclosure or is ineligible to proceed.
             Fortunately, for decades, the IRS has used a “voluntary   A practitioner must also explore the source of the income
           disclosure” practice pursuant to which taxpayers can   or assets that are the subject of a potential disclosure. A
           voluntarily disclose the fraud on an original return in the   voluntary disclosure, properly done, gives the taxpayer a
           hope of avoiding criminal prosecution and limiting civil   significant benefit by essentially eliminating the risk of a
           penalties. The voluntary disclosure practice is described in   criminal prosecution. The IRS does not intend to extend
           the Internal Revenue Manual.  On November 20, 2018,   these benefits to taxpayer who committed non-tax crimi-
                                    12
           the IRS issued a memorandum updating and explaining   nal acts or to those who acquired previously unreported
           its voluntary disclosure practice.  The IRS’s voluntary   income or assets through illegal means (other than simple
                                       13
           disclosure practice does not guarantee non-prosecution   tax evasion). Taxpayers with illegal-source income or assets
           for a taxpayer’s prior non-compliance; however, the IRM   cannot participate in the voluntary disclosure program
           does provide that the IRS will consider the voluntary   and must resolve their tax issues without the protections
           disclosure in determining whether to refer the case for   of the voluntary disclosure program.
           criminal prosecution. While this promise to “consider”   It is important to know that, while making a voluntary
           the voluntary disclosure does not provide much com-  disclosure provides significant protection against criminal
           fort to a taxpayer thinking of disclosing his or her prior   prosecution, a voluntary disclosure does not insulate a
           non-compliance, the reality is that the IRS places a very   taxpayer from civil penalties. In fact, the recent IRS memo-
           high value on the voluntary disclosure practice as a tool   randum regarding voluntary disclosures provides that,
           for bringing taxpayers into compliance and, in practice,   generally, a taxpayer who makes a voluntary disclosure
           the IRS does not prosecute taxpayers who fulfill all the   will be charged a fraud penalty for at least one of the years
           requirements for a voluntary disclosure.             for which he or she is correcting prior non-compliance.
             There are essentially four requirements for a voluntary   In certain cases, the IRS has discretion to apply the fraud
           disclosure: (1) it must be timely; (2) the income or assets   penalty to more than one year or to apply other types of
           being disclosed must come from legal sources; (3) the   penalties.
           taxpayer must be completely truthful and cooperate with   The main difference between a QAR and the voluntary
           any requests for information; and (4) the taxpayer must   disclosure practice is the type of protection that the two
           pay, or make good faith arrangements to pay, any taxes,   alternatives provide. The QAR rules only provide ben-
           penalties and interest determined to be due. Accordingly,   efits to those taxpayers who submitted a non-fraudulent
           before advising a voluntary disclosure, practitioners must   original return. In such cases, the QAR rules will provide
           make threshold determinations concerning whether the   protection against civil accuracy related penalties. In con-
           potential voluntary disclosure is timely and whether the   trast, when the prior non-compliance involves fraud, the
           source of the assets and income to be disclosed is legal.  taxpayer will need protection against civil fraud penalties
             Timeliness means that the taxpayer, or a related entity,   and even criminal fraud prosecution. While the voluntary
           is not already under audit or investigation, or that the   disclosure practice provides only limited benefits against
           IRS has not already received information about the tax-  civil fraud penalties, it does provide substantial protection
           payer’s specific non-compliance from another source. In   against criminal fraud prosecutions. Thus, in any case
           most cases, taxpayers will know if they are under audit or   where there is a potential for criminal prosecution, it is
           investigation because the IRS will have, in some fashion,   very important that the taxpayer strongly consider making
           communicated with the taxpayer, a representative or a   a voluntary disclosure.
           witness. However, it is possible that a taxpayer has been
           selected for audit or investigation without the taxpayer   Advising Clients to Amend Tax
           knowing because the IRS has not yet initiated contacts.
           The recently issued voluntary disclosure memorandum   Returns
           requires a taxpayer to request “pre-clearance” by submit-
           ting a Form 14457  to the IRS to determine whether   As is the case with taxpayers, there is no legal require-
                            14
           there is an open audit or investigation before the taxpayer   ment that tax practitioners alert the IRS of a client’s


           FEBRUARY–MARCH 2019                         © 2019 CCH INCORPORATED AND ITS AFFILIATES. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.  21
   1   2   3   4   5