Page 183 - Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Coverage Book 2023-24
P. 183

remarkable, and I certainly couldn’t have been the only one who wondered how
               he could have played parts of this concerto with such ease and accuracy – the
               overhand parts, and the extensions are considerably more demanding than the
               span of the hands (which in any case is more of a problem in the Second Piano
               Concerto).  He  was  fortunate,  too,  to  have  received  superlative  support  from
               Domingo Hindoyan and the RLPO who were sympathetic to everything Tsujii
               needed. He was rarely, if ever, drowned out by the orchestra and Hindoyan
               encouraged his orchestra to engage in dialogue with their pianist in a concerto
               that shares similarities here to the great Brahms No.2.



               I think a standing ovation was probably always going to be inevitable – and it
               was. The encore, Nikolai Kapustin’s Eight Concert Etudes, Op.40 No.1, was as
               virtuosic as you would have wanted it – jazz inflected, delivered with breakneck
               speed and highly enjoyable. I suspect Nobuyuki’s Tsujii’s performance will be
               long remembered.


               The concert had opened with a rarity – one not played at the Proms since 1932
               –  Arthur  Honegger’s Rugby.  That  nine-decade  wait  hardly  seems  surprising
               because the work is a bit of a drag, even though it is less than ten-minutes long.
               Works inspired by sports are quite thin on the ground – although Sibelius wrote
               one inspired by skiing, and Ives, at the turn of the last century, of a Harvard and
               Yale  soccer  match.  I  tried  but  couldn’t  see  much  ‘rugby’  in  the  Honegger  –
               though fleeting glimpses of Paul Dukas kept appearing for some reason.
               Honegger apparently found rugby more spontaneous than football – the first
               closer  to nature,  the  second  science  (something  my  chemistry  master  would
               never  have  accepted  as  logical).  Honegger’s  music,  far  from  implying  the
               anarchy of the former, seemed more often to achieve a rhythmic structuralism

               of the latter with its pace  and energy often repetitive enough to  suggest the
               volleying to-and-fro of rugby ball exchanges. But if the music hardly ever pauses
               then this is the kind of rugby match you wouldn’t really want to be a part of; I
               am not sure this was an uber violent match, but it was certainly one to leave you
               thoroughly exhausted.

               The  performance  was  a  fine  one  and  gave  us  a  first  glimpse  of  what  this
               orchestra and conductor partnership were like. The brass, in particular, were
               superb – brilliant, bright and bold and this is an orchestra with a rich tone, even
               a rather romantic sound. There was certainly no lack of colour in the playing –
               I just wish I had enjoyed Honegger’s rugby match slightly more than I did some
               of those I played at school. This wasn’t the bruising and bloody encounter for
               me  Honegger’s  inspiration  for  the  work  (1930’s  French  rugby  –  a  merciless
               battlefield) was quite supposed to be.
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188