Page 661 - Economics
P. 661

CONFIRMING PAGES





                  PART EIGHT
              570
                  Microeconomics of Government
                 lower costs and higher profit. The higher profit not only     benevolent government that responds with precision and
                 benefits the firm’s owners but enhances the promotion   efficiency to the wants of its citizens. The market system
                 prospects of managers. Moreover, part of the managers’ pay   of the private sector is far from perfectly efficient, and
                 may be tied to profit via profit-sharing plans, bonuses, and   government’s economic function is mainly to correct that
                 stock options. There is no similar gain to government agen-  system’s shortcomings. But the public sector too is subject
                 cies and their managers—no counterpart to profit—to cre-  to deficiencies in fulfilling its economic function. “The
                 ate a strong incentive to achieve efficiency.       relevant comparison is not between perfect markets and
                      The market system imposes a very obvious test of per-  imperfect governments, nor between faulty markets and
                 formance on private firms: the test of profit and loss. An ef-  all-knowing, rational, benevolent governments, but be-
                                                                                                           1
                 ficient firm is profitable and therefore successful; it survives,   tween inevitably imperfect institutions.”
                 prospers, and grows. An inefficient firm is unprofitable and        Because the market system and public agencies are
                 unsuccessful; it declines and in time goes out of business.   both imperfect, it is sometimes difficult to determine
                 But there is no similar, clear-cut test with which to assess the   whether a particular activity can be performed with greater
                 efficiency or inefficiency of public agencies. How can any-  success in the private sector or in the public sector. It is
                 one determine whether a public hydroelectricity provider, a   easy to reach agreement on opposite extremes: National
                 state university, a local fire department, the Department of   defense must lie with the public sector, while computer
                 Agriculture, or the Bureau of Indian Affairs is operating   production can best be accomplished by the private sector.
                   efficiently?                                      But what about health insurance? Parks and recreation ar-
                      Cynics even argue that a public agency that ineffi-  eas? Fire protection? Garbage collection? Housing? Edu-
                 ciently uses its resources is likely to survive and grow! In   cation? It is hard to assess every good or service and to say
                 the private sector, inefficiency and monetary loss lead to   absolutely that it should be assigned to either the public
                 the abandonment of certain activities or products or even   sector or the private sector. Evidence: All the goods and
                 firms. But the government, they say, does not like to aban-  services just mentioned are provided in part by  both  private
                 don activities in which it has failed. Some suggest that the   enterprises and public agencies.
                 typical response of the government to a program’s failure
                 is to increase its budget and staff. This means that public
                 sector inefficiency just continues on a larger scale.     QUICK REVIEW 29.1
                      Furthermore, economists assert that government em-    •   Majority voting can produce voting outcomes that are
                 ployees, together with the special-interest groups they serve,   inefficient; projects having greater total benefits than total
                 often gain sufficient political clout to block attempts to pare   costs may be defeated, and projects having greater total costs
                 down or eliminate their agencies. Politicians who attempt to   than total benefits may be approved.
                 reduce the size of huge Federal bureaucracies such as those     •   The paradox of voting occurs when voting by majority rule
                 relating to agriculture, education, health and welfare, and na-  does not provide a consistent ranking of society’s preferences
                 tional defense incur sizable political risk because bureaucrats   for public goods and services.
                 and special-interest groups will team up to defeat them.     •   The median-voter model suggests that under majority rule
                                                                         and consistent voting preferences, the voter who has the
                      Finally, critics point out that government bureaucrats   middle preference will determine the outcome of an election.
                 tend to justify their continued employment by looking for     •   Government failure allegedly occurs as a result of rent
                 and eventually finding new problems to solve. It is not   seeking, pressure by special-interest groups, shortsighted
                 surprising that social “problems,” as defined by govern-  political behavior, limited and bundled choices, and
                 ment, persist or even expand.                           bureaucratic inefficiency.
                      The Last Word at the end of this chapter highlights
                 several recent media-reported examples of the special-
                 interest effect, the problem of limited and bundled choices,
                 and problems of government bureaucracy. You might want     Apportioning the Tax Burden
                 to read through these examples now, relating each to the     We now turn from the difficulties of making collective de-
                 section just completed.                             cisions about public goods to the difficulties of deciding
                                                                     how those goods should be financed.
                  Imperfect Institutions
                   It is possible to argue that such criticisms of public sector
                 inefficiency are exaggerated and cynical. Perhaps they are.   1    Otto Eckstein,  Public Finance,  3d ed. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-
                 Nevertheless, they do tend to shatter the concept of a   Hall, 1973), p. 17.








                                                                                                                       9/10/06   9:41:03 PM
          mcc26632_ch29_564-580.indd   570                                                                             9/10/06   9:41:03 PM
          mcc26632_ch29_564-580.indd   570
   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666