Page 52 - CPG - Clinical Practice Guidelines - Management of Cancer Pain
P. 52

Management of Cancer Pain (Second Edition)
                    {  KLVWRU\ RI VH[XDO DEXVH YLFWLPLVDWLRQ
                    {  young age (<45 years old)
                    {  history of legal problems or incarceration

                  Tools for recognising  and predicting  opioid  misuse are available  for
                  FOLQLFDO XVH  7KH 1&&1 JXLGHOLQHV VXJJHVW WKH XVH RI 6FUHHQHU DQG
                  2SLRLG  $VVHVVPHQW  IRU  3DWLHQWV  ZLWK  3DLQ 5HYLVHG   62$33 5   DQG
                  the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) for patients considered for long-term opioid
                  therapy in predicting opioid misuse. For patients already on opioids, the
                  guidelines suggest the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) tool to
                  detect aberrant behaviour associated with opioid misuse. 61


                  •  It is important to identify patients at risk of opioid misuse so that they
                    can be closely monitored.
                  •  Fear of opioid misuse or tolerance should not preclude the start of
                    RSLRLG WKHUDS\ IRU FDQFHU SDWLHQWV H[SHULHQFLQJ SDLQ


                       $GMXYDQWV

                  Adjuvant analgesics are medications with primary indications other than
                  pain. However, they are useful in managing certain painful conditions,
                  particularly neuropathic pain. The most common classes of adjuvant
                  analgesics  used in cancer pain management  are anticonvulsants,
                  antidepressants  and corticosteroids. Evidence for  the use of  these
                  PHGLFDWLRQV ZDV ODUJHO\ H[WUDSRODWHG IURP VWXGLHV RQ QRQ FDQFHU SDLQ

                  •   Anticonvulsants
                  A large meta-analysis  on patients with neuropathic  pain  including
                  cancer-related neuropathic pain reported the following NNT to achieve
                  50% pain relief and NNH for the following anticonvulsants: 62, level I
                    {  gabapentin (900 - 3600 mg/day): NNT 6.3 (95% CI 5.0 to 8.3) and
                      NNH 25.6 (95% CI 15.3 to 78.6)
                    {  pregabalin (150 - 600 mg/day): NNT 7.7 (95 % CI 6.5 to 9.4) and NNH
                      13.9 (95% CI 11.6 to 17.4)
                  There was no evidence on a dose-response effect for gabapentin, while
                  pregabalin  showed a better response at higher  doses. Combination
                  therapy  of gabapentin  with morphine  was superior  to monotherapy.
                  6WXGLHV  XVLQJ  RWKHU  DQWLHSLOHSWLF  DJHQWV  ZHUH  PRVWO\  QHJDWLYH   7KH
                  UHFRPPHQGDWLRQ RQ WKH DQWLFRQYXOVDQWV EDVHG RQ *5$'( ZDV VWURQJ

                  In  a Cochrane systematic review,  a small RCT  on cancer-related
                  neuropathic pain showed that gabapentin 1800 mg daily and pregabalin
                  600 mg decreased  pain scores, had a morphine-sparing  effect and
                  improved functional capacity.  The quality of the evidence  was very
                  low. 63, level I

                                             34




          e-cpg inside text-Cancer pain-25/5/24.indd   34               09/08/2024   12:09 AM
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57