Page 63 - CPG - Clinical Practice Guidelines - Management of Cancer Pain
P. 63

Management of Cancer Pain (Second Edition)
                  and pelvic cancer pain (MD= -0.67, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.05). However,
                  AEs were not discussed. 93, level I

                  In a pre- and post-study on patients with uncontrolled pelvic oncologic
                  SDLQ ZLWK WKH HVWDEOLVKHG WKHUDS\ RU H[SHULPHQWLQJ RSLRLG $(V  JDQJOLRQ
                  LPSDU  QHXURO\VLV  VKRZHG  D  VLJQL¿FDQW  UHGXFWLRQ  LQ  SDLQ  VFRUH  DQG
                  morphine  consumption up to three months follow-up. AEs were not
                  discussed. 94, level II-3

                  (YLGHQFH RQ VRPDWLF SOH[XV QHXURO\VLV  H J  EUDFKLDO RU OXPERVDFUDO
                  SOH[XV  ZDV FRQ¿QHG WR FDVH UHSRUWV

                       1HXUD[LDO 2SLRLGV

                  1HXUD[LDO RSLRLGV LQYROYH WKH GHOLYHU\ RI GUXJV YLD HSLGXUDO  LQWUDWKHFDO
                  or intracerebroventricular routes. A catheter drug delivery system with
                  the aid of either a subcutaneous implanted device or spinal port with
                  DQ H[WHUQDO V\ULQJH SXPS  SURYLGHV DQ HIIHFWLYH WKHUDSHXWLF RSWLRQ IRU
                  refractory cancer pain.
                  In a cohort of refractory pancreatic cancer pain, 64.3% of patients
                  ZLWK  LQWUDWKHFDO  GUXJ  GHOLYHU\  V\VWHPV  H[SHULHQFHG  !     SDLQ
                  reduction  from baseline  after three months of treatment initiation
                  (p<0.01). 95, level II-2

                  A systematic review for the European  Palliative  Care Research
                  Collaborative (EPCRC) guidelines found no difference in pain scores
                  EHWZHHQ  QHXUD[LDO  EROXV  DQG  FRQWLQXRXV  RSLRLG  LQIXVLRQ   7KHUH  ZDV
                  also no difference between epidural morphine and systemic morphine.
                  It was concluded that spinal opioid therapy may be effective for treating
                  cancer pain not adequately controlled by systemic treatment based on
                  weak evidence. 96, level I

                  $  PRUH  UHFHQW  PHWD DQDO\VLV  VKRZHG  D  VLJQL¿FDQW  PHDQ  SDLQ  VFRUH
                  reduction of 3.64 (95% 3.09 to 4.18), up to one-month post-implantation
                  based on retrospective studies.  Improvements in symptom  severity
                  ZHUH DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK LPSURYHG 4R/  ,Q DGGLWLRQ  DOO LQFOXGHG VWXGLHV
                  that assessed the use of systemic opioids at baseline showed a dose
                  reduction following implantation. The most common intrathecal opioid
                  was morphine, which was used alone or in combination with adjuvants
                  such as bupivacaine, ropivacaine, clonidine or baclofen. 137, level I

                  $ SURVSHFWLYH SURGXFW VXUYHLOODQFH UHJLVWU\ UHSRUWHG VHYHUH $(V  6$(V
                  from intrathecal implantable device comprised of infection (3.2%), post-
                  GXUDO  SXQFWXUH  KHDGDFKHV FHUHEURVSLQDO  ÀXLG  OHDNV            SXPS
                  pocket haematoma (0.28%) and pneumonia  (0.14%). Other  AEs of
                  V\VWHPLF RSLRLGV PD\ RFFXU LQ QHXUD[LDO RSLRLG WKHUDS\ H J  QDXVHD
                                             45




          e-cpg inside text-Cancer pain-25/5/24.indd   45               09/08/2024   12:09 AM
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68