Page 257 - Constructing Craft
P. 257

writing in the magazine, New Zealand Crafts, appeared to be verging on anti-

               feminist in its form. For example, quilting, often considered a craft dominated by
               women, featured regularly in the magazine from 1983, but it was a male quilter,

               Malcolm Harrison who featured most often. Moreover, an article on Harrison
               concludes with the remark: ‘There can be no doubt that his skill and inventiveness

               have raised a pastime which was formerly regarded as one step up from
                                                                       26
               occupational therapy to the level of an important art.’  The remark was not ignored
               by a group of women artists who had attended a seminar called ‘Sexism in the Arts’

               where the article was discussed. They pointed out that quiltmaking had ‘a long and
               well-established [female] tradition’ and asked Harrison if the reason he denied his

                                                           27
               sources was because they were women?  ? Harrison and the author, Peter Shaw,
               responded to the letter but refused to concede that they had denied sources.
               However, such exchanges may have caused some craftspeople, particularly

               craftsmen, to frame future articles more carefully, or, as appears to be the case in
               New Zealand Crafts, to avoid feminist discussion entirely.


               To some extent, the quilting debate reflected the change in emphasis that had

               gradually infiltrated the studio craft movement over the 1980s. Some craftswomen

               were aware that emphasising their feminist ideals was impeding their professional
               status. As the Australian craft writer, Sue Rowley observed:


                        the  goals  of  craftswomen  in  the  late  1970s  and  early  1980s
                        were  not  necessarily  served  by  the  celebration  of  women’s
                        creative but private and under-valued crafts. For these women,
                        professional or studio crafts could not be subsumed under the
                                                                             28
                        rubric of women’s domestic traditions without cost.



               The question for many craftswomen therefore was: should craftswomen articulate
               feminist beliefs that emphasised sharing and cooperation or should they pursue a

               ‘professional’ career – a career that would generate income, and give them
               independence, and might give them enhanced cultural status? Feminists were

               trying to elevate the domestic (feminine) crafts but craftspeople knew that the ‘real’
               value of craft, both economic and cultural, was located in public (masculine) crafts.

               By validating domestic craft traditions craftswomen were seen by those in positions

               of power, such as the Craft Council of New Zealand and the QEII Arts Council, to be
               turning their backs on excellence and professionalism. The survey carried out in

                                                                          Constructing Craft
   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262