Page 221 - Constructing Craft
P. 221

observed that before the first Alternative Furniture Show in 1983 the nine furniture

               makers who participated were nervous about making a $500 deposit each to secure
                           30
               the venue.  This suggests that the $1.25 million figure was unrealistic. Statements
               such as these were speculative and three years earlier during the sales tax protests
               craftspeople would not have been eager to advertise economic success.  It was a

               sign that the studio craft movement was attempting to use statistics to promote its
               importance in the wider community. In the new professionalised environment

               success was often measured in monetary terms.


               Members of the Interdepartmental Committee also offered different opinions on the

               financial status of craftspeople. Helen Sutch, the Treasury representative on the

               committee, was convinced the task of distinguishing between art and craft was
               beyond the capability of tax inspectors but she was restrained by the government’s

               determination to raise revenue by any means possible.


                        There  was  a  feeling  on  the  committee  that  it  would  not  be
                        proper to tax art as it was not a commercial product. [T]he first
                        priority of artists was not necessarily income and profit, and the
                        great  majority  were  seen  as  struggling  financially.    However,
                        crafts were seen to be different in the sense that many of them
                        were  for  household  use  and  therefore  competed  in  the
                        commercial market with factory-made objects. But there was a
                        difficulty in setting consistent ground rules on how to distinguish
                        between art and craft, or between decorative and other ware, in
                        any way that would have been feasible for a sales tax inspector
                        to implement fairly.  At one stage a committee member said the
                        difference was that “if you could put your hand in it, it was craft,
                        if  you couldn’t, it was art.”  The committee did not accept this
                             31
                        view!

               The social and cultural background of the officials was evident from the debate

               about the distinction between art and craft. For instance, the observation that craft
               was physical and art conceptual clearly showed that separation of craft from art was

               a mindset formed by their upbringing and education. However, some craft was, in

               the minds of the officials, moving along a continuum towards art and taxing cultural
               capital in the same way as economic capital was seen by some to be lowering its

               intrinsic value.



                                                                          Constructing Craft
   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226