Page 286 - Constructing Craft
P. 286

17
               [and] co-operative spinning groups.’  The Hot Glass Company had received a letter
               on 3 July 1980 from the Labour Department requesting that they register as a
               factory.  Raos and Viesnik delayed replying, but by September were being

               threatened with penalties. In an attempt to delay again they pointed out to the Labour
               Department that because they were part of a collective all the occupiers of their

               premises would be required to register as factories. The Labour Department was
               unmoved and on 1 October repeated the threat of penalties and added: ‘It is also

               drawn to your attention that it is considered the anticipated change in legislation you

               refer to as possibly exempting home crafts from the regulation to register as a factory
                                                                                      18
               would not apply to a registered company operating as a business.’  The submission
               by the CCNZ would not have prevented The Hot Glass Company Ltd from having to

               register as a factory but by suggesting clauses that exempted crafts such as ‘co-
               operative spinning groups’ the CCNZ was demonstrating its lack of experience. In

               contrast to the CCNZ, the CAST group that had successfully lobbied against the
               1979 sales tax presented a generalised submission on the Factories and

               Commercial Premises Bill that did not suggest limiting exemption from registration to
               specific crafts or groups. In their submission they noted that craftspeople were ‘not

               registered as manufacturing wholesalers for the purposes of the Sales Tax Act’ and

               that they ‘must not be registered as factory operatives for the purposes of the
                               19
               Factories Act.’  The implication was that the government would face similar protests
               to the 1979 Sales Tax. The submissions of CAST and the CCNZ were successful
               and the new act reflected their concerns. However, some craftspeople may have

               believed that it was another example of the CCNZ being an unnecessary layer on top
               of the existing craft infrastructure. As the CCNZ tried to establish its role in the New

               Zealand craft community such instances may have suggested that it would be more

               prudent for it to emulate its British counterpart and leave such things as business
               development and political lobbying on commercial issues to others, whilst

               concentrating on the promotion of aesthetic standards and other ‘artistic’ matters.




               Marketing, Sales and Recognition
               The price craft was sold for was part of the amateur/professional debate in New

               Zealand from the 1950s. Craftspeople and others judged the standing of an

               individual craftsperson by how much their work sold for. During the 1980s in the

                                                                          Constructing Craft
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291