Page 96 - Constructing Craft
P. 96

However, although he described the movement as healthy in New Zealand,
               Spencer warned that it was changing:

                        as New Zealand itself has changed from an egalitarian society
                        to one with an increasing gulf between rich and poor. The aim
                        of  many  potters  now  is  towards  sophistication  –  what  Barry
                        Brickell  calls  zuit  (or  is  it  zoot?)  pots.  This  is  the  exhibitionist
                        approach,  where  the  piece  is  seen  as  an  object  beckoning
                        attention … in a race to be noticed or perhaps to win the prize.
                        In thus attempting to give the pot a special status, … we have
                                                                  17
                        the essence of the “fine arts” approach.

               Spencer predicted that this approach would:


                        lead to a disintegration of the New Zealand pottery tradition …
                        pottery  will  become  like  other  “fine  arts”,  the  preserve  of
                        galleries and collectors … the general public will lose touch. …
                        Where fewer, though higher priced pieces are being made, few
                        potters  will  be  able  to  survive  economically  and  will  need  to
                        supplement incomes, probably by teaching. This in turn leads to
                        pottery becoming “ceramic art” as practised within colleges and
                        universities,  where  teachers  teach  students,  who  in  turn
                        become teachers – the whole cycle touching the general public
                                  18
                        not at all.

               Spencer continued in the letter to detail the cycle of decline, describing how it would

               lead to ‘ephemera and to fashion.’ Finally he asked two questions: ‘Has New
               Zealand pottery, in chasing immediate effect, lost a wholeness it once had [in the

               1960s]? Second, are we moving from a broadly-based pottery tradition towards a
                                                          19
               closed society of self-conscious artists?’


               Spencer may have had in mind developments in the United States where, by the
               1970s, the craft artist/craft educator was a dominant figure in the craft world. For

               some craftspeople in the United States the battle that Spencer was fighting had

               been lost ten years earlier. Commenting on an article about one of America’s most
               famous potters/ceramic artists/educators, Peter Voulkos, Moishe Smith wrote to the

               editor of the Ceramics Monthly: ‘With the February [1976] issue, your magazine has
                                                                                        20
               once again shown that craftsmanship is dead in American ceramics.



                                                                          Constructing Craft
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101