Page 29 - Bulletin Vol 28 No 2 - May - Aug. 2023 FINAL
P. 29

Legal Article |New Laws About Non-Competes (Con’t.)


          not uncommon for a dentist to wish to hire a dentist who is under a contractual restriction, and if that
          dentist doesn’t disclose a contractual restriction, or if they do disclose a new hire, regardless, you may be
          subject to litigation by the prior employer for tortuously interfering with the contractual protection they
          have in place.  Being subject, or a party to such a lawsuit can be costly it requires involving an attorney,
          incurring legal fees, and potentially being liable for lost profits to the prior employer if they are successful

          on their claim.
          Part of the argument in favor of restriction non-competition provisions related to employment is that as an
          employer, you are paying the employee fair value for services rendered, and perhaps not consideration in
          addition  to  an  appropriate  amount  for  services  as  additional  consideration  for  a  restriction  outside  of

          employment, or one surviving outside of the term of employment.   This thought process has given rise to
          legislative  required  “garden  leave”,  which  is  when  an  employer pays  severance  in  exchange  for  a  non-
          compete post-termination.   Here, severance serves to compensate the individual for remaining out of the
          workforce and out of competition from the prior employer.

          it is important to differentiate a restriction on non-competes from employment or independent contractor
          arrangements as opposed to an asset purchase or stock purchase arrangement where you may buy or sell
          your  dental  practice.    Legislative  restrictions  at  the  federal  and  state  level  under  discussion  would  not
          Impact non-competition provisions related to a sale.  Meaning, when fair value is paid for a non-compete
          restriction in an arms-length negotiation for the purchase or sale of a practice, the restriction may be valid
          and enforceable, as part of the consideration to the transaction for sale.

          Regardless of whether the non-competition restriction is signed into law in New York, the recent buzz is a
          needed  reminder  for  most  employers  to  confirm  the  contractual  protections  utilized  in  their  existing
          employment/1099  agreements.    It  is  imperative  contractual  language  protecting  one  of  your  most

          valuable assets (your practice) is (i) expansive enough to protect your legitimate business interests, and (ii)
          enforceable, with properly drafted remedies for breach, if challenged in court.  For those who have not had
          their agreements reviewed in the past year or so, it may be time for a check-up.   For an assessment of
          your current contractual protections, email Taryn Crimi at TCrimi@Kirschenbaumesq.com.

          *https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/01/ftc-proposes-rule-ban-noncompete-clauses-which-hurt-
          workers-harm-competition



                               Jennifer Kirschenbaum, Esq. serves as corporate counsel to the Nassau County Dental Society, in
                               addition to her role as General Counsel to many practices in our dental community.   Jennifer and
                               the K&K Team serve to assist in hiring/firing, employment matters, corporate matters, buy/sell,
                               real estate, dispute resolution, partnership disputes and  general operating matters  for dentists
                               and  other  healthcare  professionals.    Have  a  question  for  Jennifer?  Email  her  directly  at:
                               Jennifer@Kirschenbaumesq.com or call: 516-747-6700 x. 302.





                                             Nassau County Dental Society ⬧  (516) 227-1112  |  29
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32