Page 194 - M97TB9_2018-19_[low-res]_F2F_Neat2
P. 194

7/32          M97/February 2018  Reinsurance




                        In which case, they become binding and are payable on receipt of reasonable evidence of the loss
                        settlement having been made by the reinsured. Additionally, clauses may incorporate a period within
                        which reinsurers should make payment. Unlike proportional reinsurance treaties, where claims are
                        recovered on a balance of account basis within the periodical accounts, claims under non-proportional
                        treaties are recovered individually.
                         Be aware
                         A simpler clause may also refer to ex gratia (as a favour) payments. By definition, such payments are outside the
                         terms of the original policies; however the parties may agree to write them back in so take care.

                        D6C Claims handling clauses
                        These clauses reserve reinsurers’ rights of involvement in the management and/or determination of the
                        original claim. They may be imposed in circumstances where the reinsurer’s exposure to the loss, and/or
                        experience in handling particular types of loss, is far greater than that of the reinsured. If a reinsured is
                        not well known to the reinsurer, the latter may wish to take control of a claim. The strength of the
                        relationship between the parties is a key determinant when negotiating these provisions even if, in
                        practice, a claims cooperation clause is more often than not inserted.

                         An example of a claims cooperation clause follows:
                             Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Contract it is a condition precedent to
                             reinsurer’s liability under this Contract that:

                             1.  The Reinsured shall give to the Reinsurer written notice as soon as reasonably practicable of any
                                claim made against the Reinsured in respect of the business reinsured hereby or of its being notified
                                of any circumstances which could give rise to such a claim.
                             2.  The Reinsured shall furnish the Reinsurer with all information known to the Reinsured in respect of
                                claims or possible claims notified in accordance with (1) above and shall thereafter keep the
                                Reinsurer fully informed as regards all developments relating thereto as soon as reasonably
                                practicable.
                             3.  The Reinsured shall cooperate with the Reinsurer and any other person or persons designated by the  Reference copy for CII Face to Face Training
                                Reinsurer in the investigation, adjustment and settlement of such claim notified to the Reinsurer as
                                aforesaid.

                         With the addition of the following paragraph, the clause becomes a claims control clause:
    7
    Chapter                  4.  The Reinsurer shall have the right at any time to appoint adjusters and/or representatives to act on
                                their behalf to control all investigations, adjustments and settlements in connection with any claim
                                notified to the Reinsurer as aforesaid.


                        In practice, these provisions can be a source of frustration for the parties and give rise to a number of
                        problems. For example, the absence of timely notice by the reinsured where the parties have agreed to
                        cooperate may lead to claim handling decisions being taken with which the reinsurer would have
                        disagreed. On the other hand, delayed decision making by the reinsurer may have an adverse impact on
                        the key insurer–insured relationship, leading to unnecessary friction between the two and a less than
                        optimal experience at a difficult time for the insured.
                        It is important to recognise the obvious conflict between loss settlement clauses on the one hand, and
                        claims cooperation (and control) clauses on the other. While the former trust reinsureds to make
                        settlements, the latter typically do not, providing for a certain level of involvement by reinsurers in that
                        settlement process.


                        D7 Interlocking clause
                        The interlocking clause appears in RAD (policies issued) treaties. If an occurrence or event impacts risks
         Clause appears in
         RAD (policies issued)  which attach to different treaties, the reinsured may have to run more than one retention and the
         treaties       reinsurer pay more than one limit of liability for the same occurrence or event, depending on the total
                        amount of the original losses. The purpose of this clause is to distribute those losses between the
                        involved (or interlocked) years.
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199