Page 226 - M97TB9_2018-19_[low-res]_F2F_Neat2
P. 226

8/18          M97/February 2018  Reinsurance




                        D3 Arbitration
                        Arbitration agreements are self-contained and ancillary to the commercial contracts to which they relate.
                        An express provision is required. Similarly, it is not possible to use general words of incorporation to
                        incorporate the arbitration agreement in an underlying contract into the overlying contract (see
                        section A1B, specifically Pine Top v. Unione Italiana Anglo-Saxon Re (1987)).

                        D4 Irrelevant terms

                        Section 11 of the Insurance Act 2015 provides an example of a term implied by statute law. The Act
         Reinsurers cannot
         rely on a breach of a  prohibits reinsurers from relying on a breach of a term that is entirely unconnected to the loss which
         term that is entirely  actually occurred in order to exclude, limit or otherwise avoid liability for that loss. For example, a
         unconnected to
         the loss       facultative reinsurer of an ‘all risks’ property policy may not use a breach of a burglar alarm warranty to
                        disclaim liability for a loss caused by a fire. This is because the breach was not, on the facts, relevant to
                        the loss.

                        This ruling applies to any express or implied term which, if complied with, would tend to reduce the
                        risk of:
                        • a particular kind of loss;
                        • a loss at a particular location; or
                        • a loss at a particular time.
                        It does not, however, apply to any term which defines the ‘risk as a whole’; the Law Commissions have
         It does not apply to
         any term which  suggested that this may include terms which define the geographical area in which a loss must occur or
         defines the ‘risk as  the age, identity, qualifications or experience of the operator of a vehicle, vessel or aircraft. It remains to
         a whole’
                        be seen quite how this phrase will be interpreted by the courts.
                        Importantly, the reinsured who uses this defence must be able to demonstrate ‘that the non-compliance
                        with the term could not have increased the risk of the loss which actually occurred in the circumstances
                        in which it occurred.’
                        Therefore, in the case of a theft where a burglar alarm has not sounded because it was in need of repair,  Reference copy for CII Face to Face Training
                        but the warranty states that it must sound and be in full working order, the reinsured would not be able
                        to satisfy this requirement. This is because the breach obviously caused the loss which actually occurred
                        in the circumstances in which it occurred.

                        D5 Late payments

                        Section 13(A) of the Insurance Act 2015, as introduced by the Enterprise Act 2016 on 4 May 2016,
                        provides another example of a term implied by statute law. Under this section, if the (re)insured makes a
                        claim under the contract, the (re)insurer must pay any sums due in respect of the claim within a
                        reasonable time. This applies to all reinsurance contracts entered into on or after 4 May 2017 which are
                        governed by the laws of England and Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland.
    8                   It is stated that a ‘reasonable time’ comprises a reasonable time to investigate and assess the claim. The
    Chapter             matters that may be taken into account are non-exhaustive, but examples are listed such as the type of

                        (re)insurance, the size and complexity of the claim, and compliance with any relevant statutory or
                        regulatory rules or guidance. There is also a defence where a (re)insurer has reasonable grounds for
                        disputing the validity or value of the claim.
                        If breached, the (re)insured is entitled to recover contractual damages which, in most cases, are
                        restricted to compound interest.
                        The term was introduced in part to address the unfairness highlighted in Sprung v. Royal Insurance
                        (1997). After Mr Sprung’s business was vandalised, his insurance claim was rejected and, as he was
                        unable to pay for repairs, his business collapsed. Mr Sprung proceeded to successfully sue the insurers,
                        but his indemnity did not include a sum to recompense him for the loss of his business because, at that
                        time, there was no right to damages for late payment.
                        It is permissible to contract out of these provisions, but not in respect of deliberate or reckless breaches
                        of the implied term. Note that there is a one-year-limitation period within which to bring an action,
                        commencing from the date at which full payment of the sums due under the contract is made.

                         Reinforce
                         Before you move on, make sure that you understand the difference between express and implied terms and how they
                         apply in reinsurance contracts.
   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231