Page 15 - WMPF Federation Oct-Nov 2018-flip_Neat
P. 15

Competency and Values  “                          are committed ‘to increasing

       Continued from Page 13                                                 The Force and Federation


       precisely the same way                           college.police.uk
       the exact same                                                         representation at all levels
       evidence.”
          And he asks: “What                                                  in the organisation’. The
       are the issues with   Framework for policing
       consistency? How are   Overview of framework                           Force has an obligation to
       these being addressed
       and, in the examples   BetterProfessionals  ™                          all of its staff and should be
                                forBetterPolicing
       given and being
       challenged, what is the                                                mindful of well-intended
       process? Is this an
       acceptable level of
       variance due to
       subjectivity?                                                          illegal positive
          “What about the
       wash-up sessions? Are                                                  discrimination.
       these attended by all                                                  positive action being  “
       assessors? If this is the
       process, is this adhered
       to? If not, why not?
       Evidence suggests this
       is inconsistent despite               The promotions process
       the claims to the
       contrary.”
          Another major concern has been that   Competency-based interview
       the overall score of candidates is not   l  Candidates are asked specific questions looking for behavioural evidence across six
       recorded, only an average in the required   competencies
       competence areas. This means some higher
       scoring officers fail while lower scorers are   l   There are no warm-up questions
       going through.                         l   There is a single question for each competency, with further probing questions from
          The Federation wants officers who don’t   the interviewers
       succeed to have access to the notes taken by
       assessors, to help them with any future   l   This lasts 60 minutes.
       applications but also in the interests of
       transparency. This feedback should also be
       given in a reasonable timeframe whereas   Briefing exercise
       currently some candidates are waiting for   l   This measures the six competencies
       months with some assessors admitting they
       are ill-equipped to deliver subjective   l   Candidates have to review a brief and identify key issues and make
       feedback.                                 recommendations – 40 minutes
          Finally, the appeals process is, according   l   They then present the analysis to assessors – 20 minutes
       to the Federation, unclear and inconsistent.
          “What are the terms of reference for the   l   Assessors ask questions to probe deeper – 15 minutes.
       panel? Scope is also important as is
       timeframe. Evidence supports the assertion
       that there is a long delay between     1-2-1 meeting
       submission of concern and action; it is   l   Measures five competencies
       currently an average of eight weeks. This is a
       time sensitive process so this is poor,” says   l   Looks at dealing with an individual performance issue
       Tim.                                   l   Uses professional role players
          The promotions process remains live,
       with many officers currently making their   l   Candidates have to review a brief and prepare for the meeting – 25 minutes
       way through it despite the unresolved issues   l   They then have to conduct the meeting – 25 minutes
       that are outstanding.
          The Federation is raising its concerns   l   Role players will provide verbal and written feedback to the assessors afterwards.
       with the Force and calling for further
       changes to be made to the promotions
       processes.                             Wash-up
          But it is also sounding a note of caution   l   This gives an opportunity for assessors to share ratings and behavioural examples
       about some of the positive action features   – and then come to common, agreed view of participants’ strengths or development
       of the process.                           needs
          Tim explains: “The Force and Federation
       are committed ‘to increasing representation   l   They review positive and negative evidence
       at all levels in the organisation’. The Force   l   Discussions focus on observed behaviours, trends, strengths and development needs
       has an obligation to all of its staff and   l   This, in turn, provides input for candidate feedback.
       should be mindful of well-intended positive
       action being illegal positive discrimination.”

      www.polfed.org/westmids                                        federation October/November 2018     15
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20