Page 14 - Special Issue Forensic PDF Updated

1st International Forensic Science E-Conference

word, or terminal a part ture samples of the case inter-se comparison was
of the word. Variation is (the “Agreement of sale” done to find out the type
extremely important in document containing four of forgery used to execute

identifying a writer. On disputed signatures were the signatures.
examination of a suffi- marked as ‘Q1’, ‘Q2’,

cient amount of writing, ‘Q3’ and ‘Q4’ and admit- Results
the variations a writer ted signatures of accused
includes in his/her writ- marked as ‘S1’ Physical examination

ing becomes a huge factor obtained from India in- Initially physical exami-
(Leaver, 2006) Materials come tax return verifica- nation of documents was

and Method This section tion form and ‘S2’ ob- done using hand magni-
of the paper describes the tained from medical fier. On comparison
materials and methods receipt were collected), between questioned and

used for conducting the magnifiers, stereo-micro- standard signatures, the
examination of the unique scope, zoom stereo-micro- pictorial representation of

case received at Telan- scope and video spectral questioned and
gana State Forensic Sci- comparator-4036. standard signatures
ence Laboratory (TSFSL), The disputed signatures showed similar pattern

Hyderabad. The materials were observed under vari- and had natural variations
used for conducting the ous instruments to detect between them as shown

examination are signa- any signs of forgery and in figure 1 & figure 2.

14