Page 42 - BLENDED LEARNING
P. 42

level of agreement or disagreement using a 5-point Likert scale (1 – almost never,
               2 – seldom, 3 – sometimes, 4 – often and 5 – almost always). The questions ask
               about: (1) the course’s relevance to student’s interests and professional goals,
               (2) the level of critical or reflective thinking that the student applies to the material
               in the course, (3) the level of interactivity the student engages in during the course,
               (4) the level of tutor support, (5) peer support the student is receiving in the course,
               and (6) the success of both student and tutor in making good sense of each other’s
               communication. Three hundred and twenty six (326) returns from the writer’s group
               of 11 departments totalling about 800 students registered online were received.
               We interpret the outcome as suggesting that our experiment is succeeding, though
               a lot more needs be done in the areas of peer support and interactivity, but this
               represents considerable movement from near zero level.
               Figure 1: COLLES survey result
                Preferred   Relevance  Reflective   Interactivity  Tutor   Peer   Interpretation
                options            Thinking           Support  Support
                Almost   629       577      324       540     285     483
                Always
                Often    365       410      329       418     362     393
                Sometimes  246     252      497       271     476     338
                Seldom   49        48       106       58      126     70
                Almost   15        18       49        17      54      20
                Never


               Lessons learned and the way forward
               We have learned that the bottom-up evolutionary process works for educational
               development in our context. Of the seven higher education institutions in Nigeria
               listed in the Moodle user directory, four use the VLE for distance learning as a
               repository for content; one uses it for assessment only. Only in FUTA where teaching
               staff own and drive the process is take-up growing in a gradual but fairly steady
               rate. The tools in the VLE are a major boost for collaboration and communication,
               two key things we had longed for but lacked in our practice. With their tongues let
               loose, students were a source of inspiration; they knew more than we always credited
               them with and had skills we knew nothing about. Teachers can be learners too and
               students can help drive the process. A group of students that went through our
               courses have emerged as ICT champions, giving support to other students. We have
               learned that the unexpected could happen when using technology, but we were
               undaunted because we had our face-to-face comfort zone as a backup when the site
               crashed. Teacher workload increased rather than decreased as time was required for
               professional development in IT and pedagogy, for course design, VLE management
               and course facilitation. Now work has more meaning and purpose and students’
               motivation gives us satisfaction.
               As often happens, shut-downs of universities by government, staff or students disrupt
               academic programmes. The VLE enables students to access materials and keep




                              Blended learning in English for Academic Purposes courses  |   39
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47