Page 24 - Green Builder November-December 2018 Issue

CHAPTER 01FREE THE TINY HOMES

THE “HAVE MORE” PARADOX those lucky enough to have the option.
The problem with ADU-centric ordinances is that they assist those Of course, nothing lasts forever, and short-term rentals are under
who already own a property —not would-be owners who purchase siege in many cities. Boston politicos have suggested banning Airbnb
or lease land, hoping to build small. Americans tend to think of rentals altogether (https://bit.ly/RlbMS). Portland, Maine, has
themselves as class neutral, but housing policies such as these favor limited the total number of short-term rental registrations to ‘’’.
the favored. That’s not to say the end result is undesirable. It allows In nearby South Portland, pressure from NIMBY neighbors resulted
families to put in a small house for aging parents, for example. On in a list of onerous requirements that cut o• short-term rentals at
the other hand, it won’t help a young couple stuck in an overpriced the knees (https://bit.ly/NXbPc). The list of restrictions includes
apartment move into home ownership. banning the rental of camper vans, tents, trailers and mobile homes.
And of course, because ADUs are frequently “add-on” structures, Why is this relevant? Because zoning at the local level is often
many owners are (understandably) inclined to use them as rental decided by mob rule. It therefore can change rapidly and unfavorably
properties. (See “Case Study: A Florida Getaway”.) In a time when for tiny house owners. This is one of many reasons, in our opinion,
middle-class incomes have ‡atlined while costs of living keep rising, why tiny homes—even those on foundations—should retain their
such rentals can provide relief. Estimates suggest, for example, that ability to become mobile again. That way, if the sea level rises, a
Airbnb typically amounts to about a ‰Š percent income increase for continued on page 25

FIGHTING FOR FLEXIBILITY

A new tiny house classification that allows for fixed and mobile use deserves support.

ASKED ALEX ONTIVEROS of Pacific West to pack up and move around, as some people desire
Associates, Inc. (PWA) to comment on [It’s time] “to it with their THOWs. Transporting a 401-square-
the idea of creating a new classification foot tiny house may require movement permits or
for tiny homes that would allow them additional licenses that not all TH owners may have,
to be certified for both RV applications create a new code not to mention that transporting a 40-foot-long by
and fixed foundations. This concept, he 10-foot-wide (at best) unit would be a challenge for
says, has already been suggested to the that would address the average consumer.
I International Code Council (ICC). We have seen positive reception with RPTs as
Here’s Ontiveros on where the issue stands at the problems ADUs in Los Angeles, Fresno, Ojai, Jackson Hole and
present: other jurisdictions in Colorado. These are by no means
“We have been certifying RVs and RPTs for about that labeling a the only ones, but the most visible, to our knowledge.
30 years under Pacific West Associates, Inc. (PWA) The idea of a flexible tiny home has also been
so we took it as a parallel step to certify tiny homes THOW as an brought up. Some of the challenges we see would
on wheels in either of those two categories for the include building to a code inclusive enough to
time being in the interest of safety and providing a encompass most, if not all, building department
nationally recognized building code for jurisdictions RV brings up.” requirements across the country. Securing units
to look at when this type of unit comes in. to a permanent foundation also has its own
We agree with the fact that RV certification and – Alex Ontiveros inspections that would be required as the TH rolls in.
grouping of these units together places restrictions These challenges are the reason why we have
on them. Due to this, our parent company, PWA, has been engaged in the creation of a new code specific
been engaged by the Tiny House Industry Association in committees to to tiny homes on wheels. Currently, IRC and its Appendix Q attempt to
create a new code that would address the problems that labeling a THOW cover tiny homes on foundations, but historically IRC has not covered
as an RV brings up. As with any other code, this will be an extensive process. anything on wheels. We don’t expect that they will for the time being.”
The 400-square-foot restriction has been in place since about 1979, For an example of some of the complicated wrangling going on behind
intended to keep the manufactured home industry separate from the the scenes as towns try to find a place for tiny homes, read this PDF
RV and RPT industries. (https://bit.ly/2zNqBtd) from a hired planning consultant working with
While having a TH labeled as a Manufactured Home is certainly a the city of Lyons. Note, however, this was penned before the new tiny
solution for the issue of occupancy, it does present challenges that house section was added to the IRC.
the RV and RPT certifications do not. Manufactured Housing builders
are subject to 100 percent visual inspection of their production. This Editor’s note: You heard it here first! Let’s get out there and give organizations
means that either a third-party company or a state assigned inspector such as the PWA some support. Write to the ICC and let it know you think a new,
would have to have in-plant presence while each unit is being built. This flexible hybrid classification for tiny homes is essential for the next edition of
can drive the cost up significantly for the builder and ultimately the the International Residential Code. The ICC takes proposals from anyone, and is
consumer. Another consideration of this size of unit would be the ability required to consider all of them. Contact it (https://bit.ly/2Nj5IJP).

22 GREEN BUILDER November/December 2018 www.greenbuildermedia.com

13-46 GB 1118 Tiny Houses.indd 22 10/25/18 2:18 PM