Page 50 - Green Builder November Issue Codes Update
P. 50

CODE ARENA

The Latest Rules, Regulations and Codes Impacting Sustainable Construction

cdpACCESS: The Good,

the Bad and the Uncertain

An online portal built for the ICC plus a policy change equals streamlined code

voting, but is the technology ready for prime time?

TBY MIKE COLLIGNON                                                             cdpACCESS was a new system, and it wasn’t going to be perfect on
                            HE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL has                  the first go-around. The participants were very civil and polite about
                            over 20,000 governmental voting member             any glitches that occurred.
                            representatives. However, the ICC requires
                            these officials to annually register in advance    REDUNDANCY TO THE RESCUE
                            of a vote. Unfortunately, not all take that step,
                            so the number of eligible voters will be quite     However, the stakes were much higher in the Group A cycle, as
                            a bit less than 20,000. But thanks to an online    some of the more notable codes (plumbing, mechanical, building)
                            portal built for the ICC and a policy change,      were undergoing deliberations. This time, the technical difficulties
                            all eligible voters can cast their votes without   weren’t tolerated as well. ICC staff recognized that the in-person
incurring travel expenses and lengthy stays out of the office.                 voters were losing trust in the electronic voting devices, so before
                                                                               the hearing concluded, they were scrapped in favor of hand/
   In 2014, the ICC unveiled cdpACCESS, their new online code                  standing vote counts.
development platform. Designed as a way to increase inclusiveness
in the code development process, cdpACCESS allows any registered                 According to Dave Bowman, manager of codes at ICC, the electronic
user to submit and comment on code change proposals, collaborate               voting devices won’t even make an appearance at the upcoming
with peers and (for ICC governmental voting member reps) the                   Group B public comment hearings. Vote tabulation will initially be
opportunity to vote.                                                           done by a show of hands. “If we’re not comfortable with that, then
                                                                               we’ll actually take a standing count,” Bowman says.
SO MUCH POTENTIAL
                                                                                 If you’re at all familiar with professional sports, you know
The voting function is its best feature.                                       how easily teams request reviews of the officials’ calls. With the
   For those who attended the final action hearings (as they were then         significance of the proposals on the docket, it wouldn’t be surprising
                                                                               to see vote counting on a number of proposals. This method of
called) in October 2014, they were able to use electronic voting devices       voting will probably lead to some long days (and nights) in the
to both cast their votes and have those votes logged in cdpACCESS.             hearing room.
When the vote was opened to the rest of the governmental voting
member reps, the remote voters were able to see the in-person results.           Because technology won’t be used in the hearing room, it will cause
Those who attended could also log in and change their vote, if they            a duplication of effort for those who attend in-person. The in-person
chose to do so. This portal, along with the addition of Section 8.0            vote will set the agenda for the online voting, but Bowman explained
to Council Policy 28, was going to usher ICC into a new era of code            that “this year, because we’re not using the electronic devices, the
adoption.                                                                      online governmental consensus vote will start at zero-zero. Those
                                                                               that are voting at the public comment hearing, we’ll really need to
   While cdpACCESS had undergone the expected beta testing, the                encourage them to remember to go and participate in the online
ICC wisely decided to roll it out during the Group C cycle, which              consensus vote”.
was largely the International Green Construction Code (IgCC)
development cycle. This gave ICC a trial period of sorts, since the IgCC         Bowman said that ICC is working to remedy the problem with the
was one of the newest I-codes, it was considered more manageable               electronic voting devices. They want to make sure the technology is
than the legacy codes, and it had yet to be widely adopted.                    “airtight and absolutely no way there will be a problem” in the future.
                                                                               But in the short-term, the time spent on hand/standing vote counts
   The combination of the electronic voting devices and cdpACCESS              will create an extra burden on those voters who attend.
didn’t go 100 percent smoothly, but everyone understood that

48	 GREEN BUILDER  November/December 2016                                     www.greenbuildermedia.com
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55