Page 54 - Green Builder January 2017 Issue
P. 54

CODE ARENA

The Latest Rules, Regulations and Codes Impacting Sustainable Construction

No Surprises in 2018 IECC

Online Voting Results

Less than one of every eight proposals saw change in outcome
from October’s public comment hearing.

RBY MIKE COLLIGNON                                                                    Table R406.4 (N1106.4)
                         IGHT ON SCHEDULE, the preliminary results from
                         the 2018 IECC online vote were released by the       Maximum Energy Rating Index
                         International Code Council (ICC) on Tuesday, Dec.
                         6. The verdicts largely mirrored the results of the  Climate Zone  Energy Rating Index
                         public comment hearing in late October. Of the 85
                         proposals considered, only 12 percent of the code    1 57
                         change proposals had their outcome changed by
                         the online vote.                                     2 57
       The residential energy code’s most contested proposals did not see
    a reversal of fortune. What does that mean for the homebuilding           3 57
    industry?
       ¦¦ Mechanical equipment tradeoff: Like the three previous iterations   4 62
    of the code, builders will not be allowed to trade off envelope
    insulation when using more-efficient equipment. (Author’s note:           5 61
    Both sides would be wise to put pressure on DoE to update the
    NAECA requirements on equipment. Otherwise, we’ll be witnessing           6 61
    round five of this debate in the spring 2019.)
       ¦¦ ERI path: This section underwent major changes, but the online      7 58
    vote merely affirmed actions taken at the public comment hearings.
    First, the ERI levels are going up slightly (see Table). Next, the use    8 58
    of on-site power generation determines the prescriptive envelope
    backstop. If renewables are used, the 2015 IECC prescriptive              systems was accepted at the public comment hearing after the
    requirements must be met. If renewables are not used, then the            proponent made a committee-recommended correction to an
    existing 2009 IECC requirements remain the backstop.                      accompanying table. But that decision was overturned by the online
       ¦¦ RESNET 301 (with a twist): RESNET/ICC/ANSI 301 will now be          vote.
    the only ERI methodology allowed in the ERI path. However, if the
    project has to adhere to the IRC, then the ventilation rates from the       ¦¦ An exception to allow individual wall-framing cavities for transfer
    2018 IRC (which mirror ASHRAE 62.2-2010) are to be used. Currently,       air between two spaces on the same level, in compliance with the
    RESNET 301 references the ASHRAE 62.2-2013 rates, although it has         IMC, was at first added. But online voters disagreed with those at
    been stated the standard could change to be congruent with the IECC.      the hearing and kept the exception out of the code.
       Here’s a look at a few of the code change proposals that saw their
    fate changed by the online vote:                                            ¦¦ RESNET/ICC/ANSI 380, a standard for testing airtightness, was
       ¦¦ Appendix RA, Recommended Procedure for Worst-Case Testing           prevented from entering the code by the online voting community.
    of Atmospheric Venting Systems Under R402.4 or R405 Conditions was
    ultimately removed from the code, after initially being retained.
       ¦¦ The addition of a definition for grid-interactive electric storage

52	 GREEN BUILDER  January/February 2017                                                   www.greenbuildermedia.com
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59