Page 614 - Atlas Sea Birds Ver1
P. 614

Human refuse and modification of the environment, e.g.   fed significantly further from the survey vessel when it was
                  construction  of  artificial  water  bodies,  made  alternative   in operation, and increased their foraging effort (Pichegru
                  sources  of food  available  to some of South  Africa’s   et al. 2017).  Attempts were  made to minimise  many of
                  seabirds,  including  Great  White  Pelican,  White-breasted   these impacts. For example, in 2000, following that year’s
                  Cormorant, and gulls.  They were thought to have aided   Treasure oil spill, > 41,000 African Penguins, oiled, at risk
                  increases  in numbers  of pelicans  (Crawford  et al. 1995)   of being oiled, or orphaned, were rescued at Dassen and
                  and Kelp Gulls (Steele 1992, Crawford et al. 2009) in South   Robben islands, and most were successfully returned to
                  Africa’s Western Cape.                            the wild (Crawford et al. 2000).

                  Safe breeding habitat                             Quo vadis?

                  Historically, islands in the BUS and adjacent areas provided   In  spite  of  substantial  efforts  to  conserve  land-breeding
                  safe breeding habitat for many of the region’s seabirds and   marine predators around the coasts of Angola, Namibia,
                  its seal. However, the joining  of Shark, Bird (Lambert’s   and South Africa, it is clear from recent decreases of two
                  Bay), and Marcus islands to the mainland allowed access   turtle species in Angola and the unfavourable conservation
                  to  them  by  terrestrial  predators.  Feral  cats  (Felis  catus)   status of all seven of the Benguela’s endemic seabirds that
                  were introduced  to Dassen and Robben  islands, and   more needs to be done. In particular, there is need to ensure
                  remain  at the latter, which  also  has been  substantially   adequate forage resources for seabirds that compete with
                  modified for human use. At other islands historical deposits   fisheries for prey, to protect important mainland breeding
                  of guano were removed. As most of the islands were rocky,   habitats of seabirds, and to take every effort to safeguard
                  this meant that penguins were unable to excavate burrows   breeding ‘super sites’ from potentially catastrophic events,
                  for nests, which ameliorate heat and cold and protect eggs   such as oil spills, disease, and displacements  by other
                  and  nestlings  from  aerial  predators  (Frost  et  al.  1976).   animals.
                  Instead, they had to nest on the surface, which negated   With regard to  the  first  of  these  objectives,  in  2020  a
                  these benefits and, similarly to other surface-nesting birds,  Benguela  Current  Forage  Fish  Workshop, organised  by
                  meant that penguins could be displaced from their breeding   the  African-Eurasian  Migratory  Waterbird  Agreement
                  areas by the larger seals (Crawford et al. 1989).  (AEWA),  in  collaboration  with  the  Benguela  Current
                     Some former mainland  nesting localities, including   Convention and BirdLife South Africa, recommended inter
                  estuaries and coasts, have been rendered unsuitable for   alia that tools be developed to increase the availability of
                  breeding  by  human  modifications  (e.g.  Anderson  et  al.   sufficient forage for threatened, endemic Benguela seabird
                  2003,  Crawford  et  al.  2018),  mining,  and  development,   species, such as  setting ecosystem thresholds, closing
                  which, for example,caused the extinction of an important   key seabird foraging areas to fishing, and creating suitable
                  Damara  Tern colony at Dolphin  Beach (Braby 2011). Of   seabird breeding  habitat within contracted or altered
                  71 localities known to have been used for breeding  by   distributions  of  forage  fish  species  (AEWA  2020).  For  a
                  Damara Terns, 70 were on the mainland, so Damara Terns   summary of  ecosystem thresholds derived for  seabirds,
                  are especially susceptible to mainland threats. Islands in   with particular reference to the BUS, see Crawford et al.
                  estuaries may naturally become unsuitable for breeding by   (2022).  It  is  hoped  that  information  collated  in  this Atlas
                  floods that swamp them or droughts that connect them to   will assist coastal and marine spatial planning through the
                  the mainland (e.g. Fox et al. 2024).              identification of key seabird breeding habitats that need to
                     Guano platforms provided  additional  breeding  habitat   be protected from the threats identified above, e.g. through
                  for Cape  and  White-breasted  cormorants  and  pelicans   fishing closures and prohibition of ship-to-ship bunkering
                  in Namibia to  the  north  of  Walvis Bay  (Crawford 2007).   in their vicinity,  and routing of  shipping  away from their
                  Artificial nests were deployed at some islands in attempts   proximity. Substantial information already exists on the at-
                  to improve breeding habitat for African Penguins (Pichegru   sea distributions of  several of  the land-breeding,  marine
                  2012). A headland  on South Africa’s south coast, where   predators of Angola, Namibia, and South Africa (e.g.Green
                  penguins bred for several years in the 2000s but stopped   et  al.  2015,  Robinson  et  al.  2018,  Carpenter-Kling  et  al.
                  because  of losses  to terrestrial  carnivores,  was  fenced   2022).  However, collation  of published  and  unpublished
                  off and recolonised by a pair of penguins in 2022 (Hagen   information on such distributions will assist with the
                  2022, Dyer et al. 2024).                          identification of important transit and feeding areas of these
                                                                    animals.
                  Other threats
                                                                    References
                  Other  threats  to  land-breeding,  marine vertebrates of
                  the BUS and adjacent  areas include  by-catch mortality   AEWA.  2020.  Benguela  Current  Forage  Fish  Workshop
                  in  fisheries  (da  Rocha  et  al.  2021)  and  predation  or   recommendations, 4 pp.
                  disturbance of eggs, chicks, fledglings, and adults at and   Anderson  MD,  Kolberg  H,  Anderson  PC,  Dini  J,  Abrahams  A.
                  around  colonies  by pelicans,  gulls, seals, sharks, feral   2003. Waterbird populations at the Orange River mouth from
                  and mainland carnivores, and humans (Whittington et al.   1980–2001:  a  reassessment  of  its  Ramsar  status.  Ostrich
                  1996,  Johnson  et  al.  2006,  Makhado  et  al.  2006,  2013,   74: 159–172.
                  Mwema et al. 2010, Pichegru 2012). Additionally, oil spills,   Bachoo S. 2024. Population trends and conservation status of sea
                  diseases, and severe weather conditions  have caused   turtles in northern KwaZulu-Natal. This volume.
                  substantial mortality of seabirds, or reduced their breeding   BirdLife International. 2023. IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded
                                                                        from http://www.birdlife.org on 04 January 2023.
                  success (Waller and Underhill 2007, Wolfaardt et al. 2009,   Braby J. 2011. The biology and conservation of the Damara Tern in
                  Sherley et al. 2012). Penguins showed a strong avoidance   Namibia. PhD thesis. University of Cape Town, South Africa,
                  of their preferred foraging areas during seismic activities,   233 pp.

                                                                 608
   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619