Page 4 - Issue 64__FINAL_web normal
P. 4

THE VETERAN


                    THE QUARTERLY MAGAZINE OF THE

                  VETERANS TIME TRIALS ASSOCIATION
                Founded in 1943 to promote cycle time trialling for those aged 40 and over
             Number 64                                          March 2020


                                      CONTENTS
        Officials Reports and Notices  4 - 9  National AGM Summary       16 - 18
        Norman Harvey Awarded DLM      10  Obituaries                    19 - 24
        Angela Carpenter Profile     11 - 12 Around the Groups           25 - 47
        Notes On the AGM Workshop      13  Vets Handicapping Proposal    48 - 49
        National Prize Presentation Report  14 - 16 Notice Board          50

        There seems to be much going on within the VTTA as the NEC press ahead with updating our
        competitions and results processing via our website and by closer integration with the CTT system,
        whilst continuing to respect the 75 plus years of tradition which this organisation has accumulated.

        Those of you who were at the AGM will know that the proposal to make the season long
        competitions live and regularly updated on the website has been enthusiastically received.  In my
        own group our Recorder had gone above and beyond the call of duty to include as many
        participants as possible in the 2019 results.  His reaction to the proposal was “Great.  That’ll save
        me about 100 hours work!”  The Chairman’s Piece updates us on progress - it is now a live project.
        Looking back through old ‘Veterans’ and other publications the letters page was always a very
        lively feature, with views expressed on a range of subjects and the more contentious of such
        generating some animated responses, I was pleased to be able to publish just such a letter in
        December, from ‘Rudyard Ryder’, proposing an alternative method of processing VTTA time trial
        results by age adjustments.  I awaited a response from members either by email or snail mail and
        I even scoured social media for responses.  The membership remained silent on the subject!
        Maybe most readers didn’t get as far as page 73!

        Although the response was slow to come, the concept was eventually picked up by several
        members of the National Committee who saw merit in the idea as offering a more readily
        understood form of age related competition.  This may appeal more to younger vets, but still
        retains the same allowances for performance decline with age.  Geoff Perry gave a presentation
        on the concept at the AGM workshop  and positive feedback from those present was given.
        Hopefully they will have taken the idea back to their groups and there will be local discussion,
        both in meetings and ‘around result boards’, where we will soon be gathering.
        If this age adjustment proposal has passed you by I urge you to firstly read the ‘Rudyard letter’ in the
        December Veteran, then view the AGM workshop slides available as a document download on the
        website, and finally (for now) read the NEC response (by Geoff Perry) at the back of this magazine.
        Geoff’s presentation was illustrated by Yeoman Warders (!).  Now we all know that Yeoman
        Warders are the guardians of the crown jewels, which is effectively what the standards system,

                                           4
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9