Page 777 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

Harun Yahya

The compound structure of the eye of the trilobite, one of the most ubiquitous
Cambrian Period life forms, still exists in identical form in arthropods such as
the dragonfly and the bee. This magnificent marvel of art dating back 540 mil-
lion years is just one of the amazing works of Allah.

Darwinists are still silent on the subject of the Cambrian Explosion that exhibits higher life forms

and Allah’s magnificent creation. Darwinists have gone very quiet in the face of these extraordinary
findings and behave quite literally as if they did not exist. They publish countless deceptive scenarios
they have dreamed up about the history of life in scientific journals, but try to avoid reminding people
of this huge phenomenon of 540 million years ago and how it totally refutes the theory of evolution. The

blatant deception of Charles Doolittle Walcott, who concealed Cambrian fossils, is a perfect example of
the lengths that Darwinists will go to in order to conceal the truth and perpetuate a groundless theory.
If Darwinism were really a science, if the proponents of Darwinism really were scientists, then find-
ings of such enormous scientific value, such a huge discovery, would be highlighted and discussed as a

matter of urgency on scientific websites and in books and articles. The fact that the opposite applies,
with consistent attempts to conceal concrete scientific findings, stems from Darwinism not being a sci-
ence but rather a false religion that has emerged as a stratagem on the part of the antichrist. Built on a
lie, this theory tries to survive through falsehoods. The concealment of the Cambrian fossils was just one

of the scientific deceptions perpetrated in the name of Darwinism.

7. The claim that Archaeopteryx is the ancestor of birds is a

deception

The fossil bird discovered in Germany in 1860 and given the name Archaeopteryx harbored certain
characteristics unlike those of today’s birds. Darwinists used the teeth in its jaw, the claws on its wings
and its long tail as tools for speculation, and the bird was hastily compared to reptiles and heralded, in

the absence of any scientific foundation, as a reptile-bird transitional form.
But this claim was a terrible deception.
Soon after Darwinists had mythologized Archaeopteryx as a false transitional form, the fossil bones
were examined in detail, and it emerged that this life form was not in fact a “primitive bird” exhibiting

an imaginary passage from reptiles to birds, but that its skeleton and feather structure were actually ide-
ally suited to flight, and that the features, unlike those of reptiles, were actually to be found in birds that

Adnan Oktar 775