Page 792 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

As a result of industrial pollution the lichens, a kind of moss, cover-
ing tree trunks die and the trunk turn black. Since light-colored
moths are more visible on these trunks they are more often eaten
by birds. Therefore, as the number of light-colored moths declines,
the numbers of dark-colored ones rises, as they are eaten less fre-
quently. But there being large numbers of one kind of moth is most
definitely not evolution; yet Darwinists use this to mislead people
and try to depict it as supposed evidence for evolution.

rather than on the tree trunk, there was effectively no means of obtaining such an image. For that rea-
son, Kettlewell stuck these dead animals to the trees with glue and then photographed them. 65
The New York Times made this comment when it was realized that the moths that Darwinists had so
loudly portrayed as scientific evidence for around a century were in fact fraudulent: “The most famous
example of evolution in action must now become the most infamous” 66

When The University of Chicago evolutionary biologist learned about this fraud in 1998, he wrote of
his “shame” due to the Industrial Revolution moths he had been teaching his students about for years
being a hoax, and compared his reaction to "the dismay attending my discovery, at age 6, that it was my

father and not Santa who brought the presents on Christmas Eve." 67
With the revelation of all these facts, people realized that the tale of the Industrial revolution moths,
depicted as “Darwin’s missing evidence,” was in fact a giant deception. For decades hundreds of mil-
lions of people had been deceived by photographs of a few dead moths glued onto a tree and a hoary
old tale concerning them. The real truth of the matter is this: the evidence that Darwin needed does not

exist and it is impossible for it ever to be found. Because living things did not evolve.
The interesting thing is that the Industrial Revolution moths are still presented in some text books as evi-
dence of evolution. In this way, Darwinists aim to mislead impressionable young minds that are unaware of

this fraud. Depicting a fraud as genuine evidence, even though this fraud has already been exposed, is in fact
evidence of Darwinism’s despair, lack of proof and purely ideological nature. The fact of creation is clear to
see. Darwinists trying to avoid this clear fact imagine they can find a solution by resorting to lies and trickery.
But Allah will certainly do away with trickery and falsehood and superstitious religions.

Say, “Truth has come and falsehood has vanished. Falsehood is always bound to vanish.” (Qur’an, 17:81)

15. Haeckel’s embryo drawings are fraudulent

In his 1868 book Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte (The History of Natural Creation) Ernst Haeckel sug-
gested that he had made various comparisons using human, monkey and dog embryos. The drawings

he produced consisted of nearly identical embryos. On the basis of these drawings, Haeckel then sug-
gested that the life forms involved had common origins.
But the true state of affairs was very different. Haeckel had produced a drawing of just a single em-
bryo, and then produced human, monkey and dog embryos from this by making very small changes. In
other words, it was a hoax.

That was the supposed “scientific work” (!) that Darwin cited as a reference in his book The Descent

790 Atlas of Creation Vol. 4