Page 799 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

Harun Yahya

This represents the origin of the lies, hoax fossils, hoax drawings, photographs of moths stuck onto trees,
hoax embryo diagrams, false reconstructions of no scientific value, Cambrian life forms hidden away for 70
years, hoax skulls displayed for 40 years and other frauds still preserved in various school text books for the

sake of Darwinism over the last 150 years. The devotees of the superstitious religion of evolution prefer to use
fraud rather than science in order to preserve this false faith. Darwinist scientists are united in preserving this
fraud. The French biologist and Darwinist Pierre Paul Grasse admits this in the words:

This deception sometimes takes places unconsciously, but not always. Because some people deliberately ig-

nore the facts for sectarian reasons and deny the insufficiency and erroneous nature of their own beliefs. 80

This admission by the Darwinist Pierre Paul Grasse is an expression of a secret understanding
among Darwinist circles. Since, under the system of the antichrist, Darwinism cannot be denied in any
manner, and a blind eye must be turned to fraud, deception and lies.
Darwinists sometimes confess the fact that they have adopted Darwinism as a religion. Some exam-
ples of this are as follows (Surely Allah is beyond that):

“One can have a religious view that is compatible with evolution only if the religious view is indistin-
guishable from atheism.” 81 Will Provine, atheist and evolutionary biologist and geneticist.

"Evolution … helps atheists defend their own existence, and still be consistent with their ‘religion’ of a

godless universe." 82 Richard Dawkins, evolutionary biologist and atheist.

“In fact, evolution became, in a sense, a scientific religion; almost all scientists have accepted it and many

are prepared to `bend' their observations to fit with it.” 83 Darwinist and Manchester University Professor
of Physics H. S. Lipson.

“My attempts to demonstrate evolution by an experiment carried on for more than 40 years have com-
pletely failed… The idea of an evolution rests on pure belief.” 84 The well known Lund University scientist
Heribert Nilsson who spent his whole career trying to create supposed artificial evolution among living
things.

“The law of natural selection is not, I will maintain, science. It is an ideology, and a wicked one, and it
has as much interfered with our ability to perceive the history of life with clarity as it has interfered with
our ability to see one another with tolerance.” 85 The Darwinist Kenneth Hsü, earth sciences expert at the

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.

"They call me as a witness and a lawyer and said ‘Dr. Dawkins has your belief in evolu-

tion, has your study of evolution turned you towards atheism?’ I would
have to say ‘YES’… People like me are a bad news for the
science lobby, the evolution lobby. By the
way I’m being a lot more frank and honest

in this interview than many people in this
field would be." 86 Richard Dawkins

Adnan Oktar 797