Page 862 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4
P. 862
claims that the soap his mouth has been washed out with is not at all unpleasant. But whether the child
claims the soap does not taste unpleasant is irrelevant. What matters at the end of the day is that he ex-
periences the unpleasant taste caused by the soap. Therefore, in all likelihood there is not a single
Darwinist left in the wake of all the scientific evidence proving the invalidity of Darwinism who is un-
aware that Darwinism is a fraud.
Darwinists are now aware that it is of no use to try to deceive people in order to shield the theory.
The Darwinism that they created with imaginary scenarios and various frauds over 150 years ago, and
that they kept propped up by force has finally come to an end. It is impossible for any Darwinist to per-
sist in this perverse belief once he has learned that this whole fantastical tale is untrue. Darwinists have
been waiting for a supposed savior all this time. They imagined a scientist would appear and produce
the mythical fossils they had been anticipating all these years. But they have seen with their own eyes
that this will never happen, and are now convinced of it in their own minds. Notre Dame University
Professor of Philosophy Peter van Inwogen speaks of a most valuable truth:
If Darwinians respond to this important book by ignoring it, misrepresenting it, or ridiculing it, that will be
evidence in favor of the widespread suspicion that Darwinism today functions more as an ideology than as
a scientific theory. 163
No matter how much Darwinists may say, “it doesn’t hurt a bit,” it is clear from their reactions, the
measures they take, and the intense state of panic going on, that this defeat has come as a stunning
shock. That may of course be very difficult for a scientist who has believed in the lie of Darwinism for
many years and realized he has been deceived only later in life. People are generally unwilling to admit
they have been deceived and that they have blindly supported that deceiver. That is why the first way
out is to say, “I don’t believe it” when faced with evidence against Darwinism. But in fact that person
believes in the evidence placed before him 100%. When asked again six months later his anger will have
subsided and he will start answering. In all likelihood he will say, "Darwinism may or may not be true.”
He will try to quibble and look for middle ground such as “new evidence may appear in the future.” But
the fact is he is well aware that this perverse ideology is a deception bereft of any evidence, yet he will
find it difficult to admit that right away. But nevertheless, Darwinism is finished for that person.
He will find it hard to believe (and laughable) that he ever espoused the idea that drops of oil fell into
water and turned into protein. He will wonder how he ever failed to understand that not a single transi-
tional form fossil exists; he will be astonished at himself and be stunned at how he ever espoused such non-
sense for maybe as long as 50 years. He will be
ashamed of having fallen for the Darwinist spell
and supported a lie. Even the most fanatical
Darwinists feel that today. One can see this from
various statements and sense their skepticism.
Some of them even admit that explicitly. But it is
never too late to abandon a false belief and accept
the truth. Admitting the truth and abandoning
one’s errors is a great virtue. The correct thing to
do after seeing the scientific evidence is to
openly admit that Darwinism is utter non-
sense.
Darwinists wish to avoid the elimination of the
spell of Darwinism by constantly raising young
people indoctrinated with the idea of evolution.
The reason why bodies such as the European
Parliament want to ban the teaching of the
Atlas of Creation in schools is in order to keep
the Darwinism indoctrination going.
860 Atlas of Creation Vol. 4

