Page 74 - Why Do You Deceive Yourself ?
P. 74

72               WHY DO YOU DECEIVE YOURSELF?



           Darwinism and employ the fact of creation to account for the origin of
           life.
                We have examined the collapse of the theory of evolution and the
           proofs of creation in great scientific detail in many of our works, and
           are still continuing to do so. Given the enormous importance of this
           subject, it will be of great benefit to summarize it here.


                The Scientific Collapse of Darwinism
                Although this doctrine goes back as far as ancient Greece, the the-
           ory of evolution was advanced extensively in the nineteenth century.
           The most important development that made it the top topic of the
           world of science was Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species, published
           in 1859. In this book, he denied that Allah created different living
           species on Earth separately, for he claimed that all living beings had a
           common ancestor and had diversified over time through small
           changes. Darwin's theory was not based on any concrete scientific
           finding; as he also accepted, it was just an "assumption." Moreover, as
           Darwin confessed in the long chapter of his book titled "Difficulties on
           Theory," the theory failed in the face of many critical questions.

                Darwin invested all of his hopes in new scientific discoveries,
           which he expected to solve these difficulties. However, contrary to his
           expectations, scientific findings expanded the dimensions of these dif-
           ficulties. The defeat of Darwinism in the face of science can be re-
           viewed under three basic topics:
                1) The theory cannot explain how life originated on Earth.
                2) No scientific finding shows that the "evolutionary mecha-
           nisms" proposed by the theory have any evolutionary power at all.
                3) The fossil record proves the exact opposite of what the theory
           suggests.
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79