Page 141 - The Collapse of the Theory of Evolution in 20 Questions

What Kind of Relationship is There Between Creation and Science?

physical creation. All evolutionist experiments in this direction
have ended in failure. Life can never have been created from
inanimate matter. The evolutionist biologist Andrew Scott

makes the following admission on the subject in the well-
known journal New Scientist:
Take some matter, heat while stirring and wait. That is the

modern version of Genesis. The "fundamental" forces of
gravity, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear
forces are presumed to have done the rest... But how much
of this neat tale is firmly established, and how much re-
mains hopeful speculation? In truth, the mechanism of al-
most every major step, from chemical precursors up to the

first recognizable cells, is the subject of either controversy or
complete bewilderment. 75
The root of life is based on speculation and debate because 139

materialist dogma insists that life is the product of matter. Yet
the scientific facts show that matter has no such power.
Professor Fred Hoyle, an astronomer and mathematician who

was knighted for his contributions to science, makes the follow-
ing comment on the subject:

If there were a basic principle of matter which somehow
drove organic systems toward life, its existence should
easily be demonstrable in the laboratory. One could, for in-
stance, take a swimming bath to represent the primordial
soup. Fill it with any chemicals of a non-biological nature
you please. Pump any gases over it, or through it, you