Page 231 - Fascism: The Bloody Ideology Of Darwinsim

Misconception of Evolution 231

This situation apparently indicates the invalidity of the claim that they

are ancestors of one another. A paleontologist from Harvard University,
Stephen Jay Gould, explains this deadlock of the theory of evolution although
he is an evolutionist himself:

What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lineages of
hominids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H. habilis),
none clearly derived from another? Moreover, none of the three display
any evolutionary trends during their tenure on earth. 164

Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is sought to be
upheld with the help of various drawings of some "half ape, half human"
creatures appearing in the media and course books, that is, frankly, by means
of propaganda, is nothing but a tale with no scientific ground.
Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected scientists

in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for years, and particularly
studied Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally concluded, despite being
an evolutionist himself, that there is, in fact, no such family tree branching out
from ape-like creatures to man.
Zuckerman also made an interesting "spectrum of science." He formed
a spectrum of sciences ranging from those he considered scientific to those he

considered unscientific. According to Zuckerman's spectrum, the most
"scientific"–that is, depending on concrete data–fields of science are chemistry
and physics. After them come the biological sciences and then the social
sciences. At the far end of the spectrum, which is the part considered to be most
"unscientific," are "extra-sensory perception"–concepts such as telepathy and

sixth sense–and finally "human evolution." Zuckerman explains his reasoning:
We then move right off the register of objective truth into those fields of
presumed biological science, like extrasensory perception or the
interpretation of man's fossil history, where to the faithful [evolutionist]

anything is possible - and where the ardent believer [in evolution] is
sometimes able to believe several contradictory things at the same
time. 165

The tale of human evolution boils down to nothing but the prejudiced
interpretations of some fossils unearthed by certain people, who blindly
adhere to their theory.