Page 113 - Darwinism Refuted
P. 113

Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)


                 More importantly, however, none of the structures illustrated in Sloan's
                 article that are claimed to be feathers have actually been proven to be
                 feathers. Saying that they are is little more than wishful thinking that has
                 been presented as fact. The statement on page 103 that "hollow, hairlike
                 structures characterize protofeathers" is nonsense considering that
                 protofeathers exist only as a theoretical construct, so that the internal
                 structure of one is even more hypothetical.
                 The hype about feathered dinosaurs in the exhibit currently on display at the
                 National Geographic Society is even worse, and makes the spurious claim
                 that there is strong evidence that a wide variety of carnivorous dinosaurs
                 had feathers. A model of the undisputed dinosaur  Deinonychus and
                 illustrations of baby tyrannosaurs are shown clad in feathers, all of which is
                 simply imaginary and has no place outside of science fiction.
                 Sincerely,
                 Storrs L. Olson
                 Curator of Birds
                 National Museum of Natural History
                 Smithsonian Institution 141
                 This revealing case demonstrates two important facts. First, there are
             people who have no qualms about resorting to forgery in an effort to find
             evidence for the theory of evolution. Second, some highly reputable
             popular science journals, which have assumed the mission of imposing
             the theory of evolution on people, are perfectly willing to disregard any
             facts that may be inconvenient or have alternative interpretations. That is,
             they have become little more than propaganda tools for propagating the
             theory of evolution. They take not a scientific, but a dogmatic, stance and
             knowingly compromise science to defend the theory of evolution to which
             they are so strongly devoted.
                 Another important aspect of the matter is that there is no evidence for
             the thesis that birds evolved from dinosaurs. Because of the lack of
             evidence, either fake evidence is produced, or actual evidence is
             misinterpreted. In truth, there is no evidence that birds have evolved from
             another living species. On the contrary, all discoveries show that birds
             emerged on the earth already in full possession of their distinctive body
             structures.




                                              111
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118