Page 194 - Darwinism Refuted

DARWINISM REFUTED

Nebraska man, and
Henry Fairfield Osborn,
who named it.

Conclusion
All the scientific deceptions and prejudiced evaluations made to
support the theory of evolution show that the theory is a kind of ideology,
and not at all a scientific account. Like all ideologies, this one too has its
fanatical supporters, who are desperate to prove evolution, at no matter
what cost. Or else they are so dogmatically bound to the theory that every
new discovery is perceived as a great proof of the theory, even if it has
nothing to do with evolution. This is really a very distressing picture for
science, because it shows that science is being misdirected in the name of a
dogma.
In his book Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth, the Swedish scientist
Soren Lovtrup has this to say on the subject:
I suppose that nobody will deny that it is a great misfortune if an entire
branch of science becomes addicted to a false theory. But this is what has
happened in biology: for a long time now people discuss evolutionary
problems in a peculiar "Darwinian" vocabulary—"adaptation,""selection
pressure,""natural selection," etc.—thereby believing that they contribute to
the explanation of natural events. They do not... I believe that one day the
Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of
science. 237
Further proof that Darwinism is the greatest deception in the history
of science is provided by molecular biology.

192