Page 177 - The Cambrian Evidence that Darwin Failed to Comprehend

HARUN YAHYA

The words “a burst of evolu-
tionary adaptation” are actually
completely empty. There is no scien-
tific basis for linking changing cli-
matic conditions with the scenario
of a transition from single-celled to
multi-celled organisms. For that
reason, evolutionists have never
touched on which fictitious evolu-
tionary mechanisms might have en-
tered the equation to give rise to 50
entirely different phyla.
How, for instance, did melting
glaciers add new genetic informa-
tion to the DNA of single-celled or-
ganisms? What climatic factors
could have endowed the DNA of a
single-celled organism with new ge-
netic information for such complex “You never say ‘impossible’ when
you’re talking about life, because
organs as eyes, limbs and antennae?
there are always some bacteria out
What experimental evidence sup- there that will prove you wrong. But
it’s highly unlikely. You just can’t
ports such a scenario? For example,
freeze the whole world over and ex-
have bacteria kept at very low tem- pect life to survive it.” —
peratures in laboratory conditions Kevin Peterson
ever been observed to acquire new
genes and develop into multi-celled organisms?
Evolutionists cannot answer these questions, which is why
they try to gloss over the subject with far-fetched explanations such
as “It happened somehow. Much more complex life forms suddenly
evolved as climatic conditions improved.”
There is no cause-and-effect relationship between the Snowball

Adnan Oktar

175