Page 193 - The Cambrian Evidence that Darwin Failed to Comprehend
P. 193

HARUN YAHYA

           plans that emerged in the Cambrian explosion requires a separate
           explanation, but neo-Darwinists have no scientific explanation for
           any of them.
                Stephen C. Meyer, who earned his Ph.D. in the History and
           Philosophy of Science from Cambridge University, sets out the emp-
           tiness and failure of neo-Darwinist claims:
                In the second scenario, neo-Darwinists envisioned novel genes and
                proteins arising by numerous successive mutations in the preexisting
                genetic text that codes for proteins. To adapt Dawkins’s metaphor, this
                scenario envisions gradually climbing down one functional peak and
                then ascending another. Yet mutagenesis experiments again suggest a
                difficulty. Recent experiments show that, even when exploring a re-
                gion of sequence space populated by proteins of a single fold and
                function, most multiple-position changes quickly lead to loss of func-
                tion. Yet to turn one protein into another with a completely novel
                structure and function requires specified changes at many sites.
                Indeed, the number of changes necessary to produce a new protein
                greatly exceeds the number of changes that will typically produce
                functional losses. Given this, the probability of escaping total func-
                tional loss during a random search for the changes needed to produce
                a new function is extremely small—and this probability diminishes
                exponentially with each additional requisite change. Thus, Axe’s re-
                sults imply that, in all probability, random searches for novel proteins
                (through sequence space) will result in functional loss long before any
                novel functional protein will emerge. 137
                Experiments performed in the early 1990s revealed that the
           probability of any short protein consisting of 100 amino acids form-
                                   65 138
           ing at random is 1 in 10 .   The structures that appeared in the
           Cambrian require the existence of much more complex functional
           proteins, resulting from the combination of a much higher number
           of amino acids. Neo-Darwinists should be able to explain the forma-


                                    Adnan  Oktar


                                        191
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198