Page 142 - Is Rumism a Threat ?
P. 142

140                 Is Rumism A Threat?



                 Neo-Darwinism and Mutations

                 In order to find a solution, Darwinists advanced the "Modern Synthetic The-
            ory," or as it is more commonly known, Neo-Darwinism, at the end of the 1930s.
            Neo-Darwinism added mutations, which are distortions formed in the genes of
            living beings due to such external factors as radiation or replication errors, as the
            "cause of favorable variations" in addition to natural selection.
                 Today, the model that Darwinists espouse, despite their own awareness of its
            scientific invalidity, is Neo-Darwinism. The theory maintains that millions of liv-

            ing species were formed through a process whereby numerous complex organs of
            these organisms (e.g., ears, eyes, lungs, and wings) underwent "mutations", that
            is, genetic disorders. Yet, there is an outright scientific fact that totally undermines
            this theory: Mutations do not cause living beings to develop; on the contrary,
            they are always harmful. The horrific images that appeared after the nuclear
            explosions in Chernobyl, Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the exact results brought
            about by mutations. The organisms with proper structures either died or were

            severely damaged by mutations.
                 The reason for this is very simple: DNA has a very complex structure, and
            random effects can only harm it. The American geneticist B. G. Ranganathan
            explains this as follows:
                 First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most mutations are
                 harmful since they are random, rather than orderly changes in the structure of
                 genes; any random change in a highly ordered system will be for the worse, not
                 for the better. For example,  if an earthquake were to shake a highly
                 ordered structure such as a building, there would be a random change in
                 the framework of the building which, in all probability, would not be
                 an improvement. (B. G. Ranganathan, Origins?, Pennsylvania: The Ban-
                 ner of Truth Trust, 1988, p. 7.)

                 According to the claims of Darwinists, mutations must produce proportion-

            ate and coherent changes all over the body. For example, as per the claims of Dar-
            winists, if an ear is formed on the right side as a result of chance mutations just as
            they claim, chance mutations should also form a second ear on the left side that
            shares the same symmetry and properties, and hears just as well. The hammer,
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147