Page 127 - The Evolution Impasse 1
P. 127

125



           an objective reality. Using the false aut-  While this totalitarian approach im-
           hority bestowed by this deception, they  poses the theory of evolution on society
           call on other religious believers to follow  as a scientific fact, it also keeps a tight
           them. According to the evolutionist’s ar-  reign on scientific circles. Most present-
           gument, if other religions accept evoluti-  day biologists worship the pagan religion
           on and the concepts that follow from it,  in question, and any who do not share
           then all socio-political measures based  that belief are silenced. In this system,
           on evolution will be perceived as a moral  the theory of evolution becomes a sacred
           teaching.                           cow. Scientists who reject evolution lose
              George Gaylord Simpson, one of the  any chance of rising in their careers.
           most important figures in the neo-Darwi-  The well-known professor of ana-
           nist movement, makes this clear:    tomy Thomas Dwight describes this as
                                               an intellectual dictatorship:
              Of course there are some beliefs still cur-
              rent, labeled as religious and involved in  The tyranny of the zeitgeist in the
              religious emotions that are flatly incom-  matter of evolution is overwhelming to
              patible with evolution and therefore are  a degree of which outsiders have no idea.
              intellectually untenable in spite of their  Not only does it influence (as I admit it
              emotional appeal. Nevertheless, I take it  does in my own case) our manners of
              as now self-evident, requiring no further  thinking, but there is oppression as in the
              special discussion, that evolution and tru-  days of the Terror. How very few of the
              e religion are compatible. 158      leaders of science dare tell the truth con-
              This implies that evolution and the  cerning their own state of mind. 159
           scientific teachings developed on the ba-
           sis of it have the authority to judge other
           religions. It will be up to evolutionist sci-
           ence to decide which religions or which
           interpretation will be regarded as the
           “true” one. The teaching referred to as
           true religion makes no claims regarding
           the observable universe and that makes
           do solely with setting out moral criteria
           for human beings. Everything to do with
           the observable universe—science, eco-
           nomics, politics, law, etc—is to be deter-
           mined in the light of an evolutionary
           conception.





           Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132