Page 179 - The Evolution Impasse 1
P. 179

177



                                               give the impression that each one is the
                                               ancestor of the one succeeding it. Yet the
           Imaginary Human                     latest paleoanthropological findings
           Family Tree, the                    show that Australopithecines, Homo ha-

              The Darwinist claim assumes that  bilis and H. erectus all lived in the same
           modern humans evolved from various  period in different regions of the world.
           ape-like creatures. The assertion is that  Moreover, some humans belonging to
           various transitional forms between mo-  the species Homo erectus were living
           dern man and his supposed forbears  until very modern times and were pre-
           must have lived during this period,  sent in the same surroundings as Homo
           which is assumed to have begun 4 to 5  sapiens neandertalensis and Homo sapi-
           million years ago. This totally fictitious  ens sapiens (modern man). This, of co-
           scenario consists of four basic species:  urse, clearly invalidates the claim that
              1. Australopithecus              these forms are one another’s ancestors.
              2. Homo habilis
              3. Homo erectus
                                               Impasse of Chaos
              4. Homo sapiens
                                               Theory, the
              Evolutionists attach the name Aus-
           tralopithecus, meaning “southern ape,”  — See Second Law of Thermody-
           to the first supposed ape-like ancestors  namics, the (The Law of Entropy).
           of man. These creatures are in fact an ex-
           tinct species of ape. There are various  Aware that the Second Law of Ther-
           types of Australopithecines, some of  modynamics makes evolution impossib-
           which are large apes and others of which  le, various evolutionist scientists have
           are smaller and more delicate. (See Aus-  recently engaged in speculation in order
           tralopithecus, the)                 to bridge the gulf between the Second
              The subsequent stage—and genus—  Law and the theory of evolution and to
           in human evolution is classified as Ho-  clear away this obstacle.
           mo, in other words “man.” According to  Of these advocates, the Belgian sci-
           the claim, living things in the Homo ge-  entist Ilya Prigogine is the best-known
           nus are more developed than Australo-  with his claims made in the hope of re-
           pithecus. It is then claimed that H. sapi-  conciling Termodynamics and evolution.
           ens, or modern man, emerged in the final  Starting from the concept of Chaos The-
           phase of this genus’ evolution.     ory, Prigogine put forward a number of
              In coming up with the series Austra-  hypotheses to the effect that order could
           lopithecines > Homo habilis > Homo  emerge from chaos. Yet despite all his
           erectus > Homo sapiens, evolutionists  endeavors, Prigogine failed to reconcile



           Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)
   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184