Page 235 - Beautiful Rohingyas

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya) 233

Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is
"upheld" with the help of various drawings of some "half ape, half
human" creatures appearing in the media and course books, that
is, frankly, by means of propaganda, is nothing but a tale with no

scientific foundation.
Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected
scientists in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for
years and studied Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally con-
cluded, despite being an evolutionist himself, that there is, in fact,

no such family tree branching out from ape-like creatures to
man.
Zuckerman also made an interesting "spectrum of science"
ranging from those he considered scientific to those he considered
unscientific. According to Zuckerman's spectrum, the most "scien-

tific"—that is, depending on concrete data—fields of science are
chemistry and physics. After them come the biological sciences
and then the social sciences. At the far end of the spectrum, which
is the part considered to be most "unscientific," are "extra-sensory
perception"—concepts such as telepathy and sixth sense—and
finally "human evolution." Zuckerman explains his reasoning:

We then move right off the register of objective truth into those fields
of presumed biological science, like extrasensory perception or the
interpretation of man's fossil history, where to the faithful [evolution-
ist] anything is possible – and where the ardent believer [in evolution]

is sometimes able to believe several contradictory things at the same
time. (Solly Zuckerman, Beyond the Ivory Tower, p. 19)
The tale of human evolution boils down to nothing but the

prejudiced interpretations of some fossils unearthed by certain
people, who blindly adhere to their theory.