Page 245 - Beautiful Rohingyas
P. 245

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya)                        243





             squeezes the entire universe in a pitch-dark place of a few cubic
             centimeters in a three-dimensional, colored, shadowy, and lumi-
             nous form.


                  A Materialist Faith
                  The information we have presented so far shows us that the
             theory of evolution is incompatible with scientific findings. The

             theory's claim regarding the origin of life is inconsistent with sci-
             ence, the evolutionary mechanisms it proposes have no evolution-
             ary power, and fossils demonstrate that the required intermediate
             forms have never existed. So, it certainly follows that the theory of
             evolution should be pushed aside as an unscientific idea. This is
             how many ideas, such as the Earth-centered universe model, have
             been taken out of the agenda of science throughout history.
                  However, the theory of evolution is kept on the agenda of sci-
             ence. Some people even try to represent criticisms directed against
             it as an "attack on science." Why?
                  The reason is that this theory is an indispensable dogmatic
             belief for some circles. These circles are blindly devoted to mate-
             rialist philosophy and adopt Darwinism because it is the only
             materialist explanation that can be put forward to explain the
             workings of nature.
                  Interestingly enough, they also confess this fact from time to
             time. A well-known geneticist and an outspoken evolutionist,
             Richard C. Lewontin from Harvard University, confesses that he is

             "first and foremost a materialist and then a scientist":
                  It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel
                  us accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the
                  contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material caus-
                  es to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that pro-
                  duce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no mat-
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250