Page 274 - What Kind of Yemen ?
P. 274

What Kind of Yemen?


            torical [puzzles] such as the origin of life or of Homo sapiens, are
            extremely difficult and may even resist a final, satisfying explanation."
            ("Could science be brought to an end by scientists' belief that they have
            final answers or by society's reluctance to pay the bills?"  Scientific
            American, December 1992, p. 20)
                 By outlining the link chain as  Australopithecus > Homo habilis >
            Homo erectus > Homo sapiens, evolutionists imply that each of these
            species is one another's ancestor. However, recent findings of paleoan-
            thropologists have revealed that  Australopithecus,  Homo habilis, and
            Homo erectus lived at different parts of the world at the same time.
            (Alan Walker, Science, vol. 207, 7 March 1980, p. 1103; A. J. Kelso, Phys-
            ical Antropology, 1st ed., J. B. Lipincott Co., New York, 1970, p. 221; M.
            D. Leakey,  Olduvai Gorge, vol. 3, Cambridge University Press, Cam-
            bridge, 1971, p. 272.)
                 Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified as Homo erectus
            have lived up until very modern times. Homo sapiens neandarthalen-
            sis and Homo sapiens sapiens (man) co-existed in the same region.
            (Jeffrey Kluger, "Not So Extinct After All: The Primitive Homo Erectus
            May Have Survived Long Enough To Coexist With Modern Humans,"
            Time, 23 December 1996)
                 This situation apparently indicates the invalidity of the claim that
            they are ancestors of one another. The late Stephen Jay Gould
            explained this deadlock of the theory of evolution although he was
            himself one of the leading advocates of evolution in the twentieth cen-
            tury:
                 What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lineages of hominids
                 (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H. habilis), none clearly
                 derived from another? Moreover, none of the three display any evolutionary
                 trends during their tenure on earth.  (S. J. Gould, Natural History, vol. 85,
                 1976, p. 30)
                 Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is "upheld"
            with the help of various drawings of some "half ape, half human" crea-
            tures appearing in the media and course books, that is, frankly, by
            means of propaganda, is nothing but a tale with no scientific founda-
            tion.
                 Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected sci-
            entists in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for years



                                             272
   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279